Literature DB >> 17151229

Cellular mechanisms underlying antiepileptic effects of low- and high-frequency electrical stimulation in acute epilepsy in neocortical brain slices in vitro.

Yitzhak Schiller1, Yael Bankirer.   

Abstract

Approximately 30% of epilepsy patients suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy. Direct electrical stimulation of the epileptogenic zone is a potential new treatment modality for this devastating disease. In this study, we investigated the effect of two electrical stimulation paradigms, sustained low-frequency stimulation and short trains of high-frequency stimulation, on epileptiform discharges in neocortical brain slices treated with either bicuculline or magnesium-free extracellular solution. Sustained low-frequency stimulation (5-30 min of 0.1- to 5-Hz stimulation) prevented both interictal-like discharges and seizure-like events in an intensity-, frequency-, and distance-dependent manner. Short trains of high-frequency stimulation (1-5 s of 25- to 200-Hz stimulation) prematurely terminated seizure-like events in a frequency-, intensity-, and duration-dependent manner. Roughly one half the seizures terminated within the 100-Hz stimulation train (P < 0.01 compared with control), whereas the remaining seizures were significantly shortened by 53 +/- 21% (P < 0.01). Regarding the cellular mechanisms underlying the antiepileptic effects of electrical stimulation, both low- and high-frequency stimulation markedly depressed excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs). The EPSP amplitude decreased by 75 +/- 3% after 10-min, 1-Hz stimulation and by 86 +/- 6% after 1-s, 100-Hz stimulation. Moreover, partial pharmacological blockade of ionotropic glutamate receptors was sufficient to suppress epileptiform discharges and enhance the antiepileptic effects of stimulation. In conclusion, this study showed that both low- and high-frequency electrical stimulation possessed antiepileptic effects in the neocortex in vitro, established the parameters determining the antiepileptic efficacy of both stimulation paradigms, and suggested that the antiepileptic effects of stimulation were mediated mostly by short-term synaptic depression of excitatory neurotransmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17151229     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00514.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction.

Authors:  Alicia L Jensen; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Changes of paired-pulse evoked responses during the development of epileptic activity in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Zhou-yan Feng; Xiao-jing Zheng; Cong Tian; Yang Wang; Hao-yu Xing
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  High frequency stimulation can suppress globally seizures induced by 4-AP in the rat hippocampus: an acute in vivo study.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Chiang; Chou-Ching K Lin; Ming-Shaung Ju; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Deep brain stimulation in the dish: focus on mechanisms.

Authors:  Detlev Boison
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.500

5.  Computational modeling of epileptiform activities in medial temporal lobe epilepsy combined with in vitro experiments.

Authors:  Sora Ahn; Sang Beom Jun; Hyang Woon Lee; Seungjun Lee
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Blockade of in vitro ictogenesis by low-frequency stimulation coincides with increased epileptiform response latency.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kano; Yuji Inaba; Margherita D'Antuono; Giuseppe Biagini; Maxime Levésque; Massimo Avoli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Study of the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency stimulation following kindling (a review of the cellular mechanism related to the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation).

Authors:  Zohreh Ghotbeddin; Mahyar Janahmadi; Ali Yadollahpour
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Studying network mechanisms using intracranial stimulation in epileptic patients.

Authors:  Olivier David; Julien Bastin; Stéphan Chabardès; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20

9.  Adaptive control of epileptiform excitability in an in vitro model of limbic seizures.

Authors:  Gabriella Panuccio; Arthur Guez; Robert Vincent; Massimo Avoli; Joelle Pineau
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 10.  Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control.

Authors:  Sridhar Sunderam; Bruce Gluckman; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.