Literature DB >> 23473842

Functional disconnection of axonal fibers generated by high frequency stimulation in the hippocampal CA1 region in-vivo.

Zhouyan Feng1, Xiaojing Zheng, Ying Yu, Dominique M Durand.   

Abstract

High frequency stimulation (HFS) applied in the brain has been shown to be efficient for treating several brain disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy. But the mechanisms underlying HFS are not clear. In particular, the effect of HFS on axons has been intriguing since axonal propagation plays an important role in the functional outcome of HFS. In order to study the potential effect of axonal block by HFS in-vivo, both orthodromic- and antidromic-HFS (O-HFS, A-HFS) with biphasic pulses were applied to the hippocampal CA1 region in anaesthetized rats. Changes in the amplitude and latency of orthodromic- and antidromic-population spikes within 1-min long period of stimulation at 50, 100 and 200 Hz HFS were analyzed. The results show that except for a short onset period, activity evoked by O-HFS with a frequency over 100 Hz could not be sustained. For A-HFS at frequencies over 100 Hz, the amplitudes and the latencies of antidromic population spike (APS) greatly decreased and increased respectively. Significantly larger changes in APS latency were observed in HFS than those generated at low frequency, suggesting a suppression of axon conduction by HFS. Furthermore, the CA1 somata remained excitable while failing to respond to excitation from orthodromic or antidromic HFS. Taken together, these results show that HFS produces an axonal block of both afferent and efferent fibers localized to the area of stimulation since it does not affect the excitability of CA1 somata. This effect of HFS on axons causes a functional disconnection of axonal pathways that is reversible and temporary. The reversible disconnection or temporary deafferentation between putative therapeutic targets could have extensive implication for various clinical applications of HFS to treat brain diseases.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473842      PMCID: PMC3631450          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  36 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: anatomical, neurophysiological, and outcome correlations with the effects of stimulation.

Authors:  M M Lanotte; M Rizzone; B Bergamasco; G Faccani; A Melcarne; L Lopiano
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Apical and basal orthodromic population spikes in hippocampal CA1 in vivo show different origins and patterns of propagation.

Authors:  F Kloosterman; P Peloquin; L S Leung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Depolarization block of neurons during maintenance of electrographic seizures.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Philip J Hahn; John E Fox; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Brief bursts of pulse stimulation terminate afterdischarges caused by cortical stimulation.

Authors:  R P Lesser; S H Kim; L Beyderman; D L Miglioretti; W R Webber; M Bare; B Cysyk; G Krauss; B Gordon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of addiction.

Authors:  Jens Kuhn; Michaela Möller; Ulf Müller; Bernhard Bogerts; Karl Mann; Theo O J Gründler
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  The generation of nerve impulses in mammalian axons by changing the concentrations of the normal constituents of extracellular fluid.

Authors:  R Orchardson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Observations on anodal polarization of cutaneous nerve.

Authors:  K L Casey; M Blick
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Use-dependent depression of IPSPs in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells in vitro.

Authors:  M McCarren; B E Alger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The optimal stimulation site for chronic stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  T Yokoyama; K Sugiyama; S Nishizawa; N Yokota; S Ohta; S Akamine; H Namba
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.875

10.  Feed-forward dendritic inhibition in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells studied in vitro.

Authors:  B E Alger; R A Nicoll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  15 in total

1.  Axonal and synaptic failure suppress the transfer of firing rate oscillations, synchrony and information during high frequency deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Robert Rosenbaum; Andrew Zimnik; Fang Zheng; Robert S Turner; Christian Alzheimer; Brent Doiron; Jonathan E Rubin
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 2.  Comparison and Selection of Current Implantable Anti-Epileptic Devices.

Authors:  Stephen Wong; Ram Mani; Shabbar Danish
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Suppression of Neuronal Firing Following Antidromic High-Frequency Stimulations on the Neuronal Axons in Rat Hippocampal CA1 Region.

Authors:  Yue Yuan; Zhouyan Feng; Gangsheng Yang; Xiangyu Ye; Zhaoxiang Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  The cortical evoked potential corresponds with deep brain stimulation efficacy in rats.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  High frequency stimulation extends the refractory period and generates axonal block in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Zhouyan Feng; Ying Yu; Zheshan Guo; Jiayue Cao; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures.

Authors:  Gregory K Bergey; Martha J Morrell; Eli M Mizrahi; Alica Goldman; David King-Stephens; Dileep Nair; Shraddha Srinivasan; Barbara Jobst; Robert E Gross; Donald C Shields; Gregory Barkley; Vicenta Salanova; Piotr Olejniczak; Andrew Cole; Sydney S Cash; Katherine Noe; Robert Wharen; Gregory Worrell; Anthony M Murro; Jonathan Edwards; Michael Duchowny; David Spencer; Michael Smith; Eric Geller; Ryder Gwinn; Christopher Skidmore; Stephan Eisenschenk; Michel Berg; Christianne Heck; Paul Van Ness; Nathan Fountain; Paul Rutecki; Andrew Massey; Cormac O'Donovan; Douglas Labar; Robert B Duckrow; Lawrence J Hirsch; Tracy Courtney; Felice T Sun; Cairn G Seale
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Novel Stimulation Paradigms with Temporally-Varying Parameters to Reduce Synchronous Activity at the Onset of High Frequency Stimulation in Rat Hippocampus.

Authors:  Ziyan Cai; Zhouyan Feng; Zheshan Guo; Wenjie Zhou; Zhaoxiang Wang; Xuefeng Wei
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Simulation Study of Intermittent Axonal Block and Desynchronization Effect Induced by High-Frequency Stimulation of Electrical Pulses.

Authors:  Zheshan Guo; Zhouyan Feng; Yang Wang; Xuefeng Wei
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Somatosensory stimulation suppresses the excitability of pyramidal cells in the hippocampal CA1 region in rats.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Zhouyan Feng; Jing Wang; Xiaojing Zheng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Axonal Stimulations With a Higher Frequency Generate More Randomness in Neuronal Firing Rather Than Increase Firing Rates in Rat Hippocampus.

Authors:  Zhaoxiang Wang; Zhouyan Feng; Xuefeng Wei
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.