Literature DB >> 19659490

Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.

Kevin W Eva1, Harold I Reiter, Kien Trinh, Parveen Wasi, Jack Rosenfeld, Geoffrey R Norman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this paper we report on further tests of the validity of the multiple mini-interview (MMI) selection process, comparing MMI scores with those achieved on a national high-stakes clinical skills examination. We also continue to explore the stability of candidate performance and the extent to which so-called 'cognitive' and 'non-cognitive' qualities should be deemed independent of one another.
METHODS: To examine predictive validity, MMI data were matched with licensing examination data for both undergraduate (n = 34) and postgraduate (n = 22) samples of participants. To assess the stability of candidate performance, reliability coefficients were generated for eight distinct samples. Finally, correlations were calculated between 'cognitive' and 'non-cognitive' measures of ability collected in the admissions procedure, on graduation from medical school and 18 months into postgraduate training.
RESULTS: The median reliability of eight administrations of the MMI in various cohorts was 0.73 when 12 10-minute stations were used with one examiner per station. The correlation between performance on the MMI and number of stations passed on an objective structured clinical examination-based licensing examination was r = 0.43 (P < 0.05) in a postgraduate sample and r = 0.35 (P < 0.05) in an undergraduate sample of subjects who sat the MMI 5 years prior to sitting the licensing examination. The correlation between 'cognitive' and 'non-cognitive' assessment instruments increased with time in training (i.e. as the focus of the assessments became more tailored to the clinical practice of medicine). DISCUSSION: Further evidence for the validity of the MMI approach to making admissions decisions has been provided. More generally, the reported findings cast further doubt on the extent to which performance can be captured with trait-based models of ability. Finally, although a complementary predictive relationship has consistently been observed between grade point average and MMI results, the extent to which cognitive and non-cognitive qualities are distinct appears to depend on the scope of practice within which the two classes of qualities are assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19659490     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  55 in total

1.  Evaluation of an interview process for admission into a school of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael P Kelsch; Daniel L Friesner
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Consortium of European chiropractic educators workshop 2010.

Authors:  Martin Wangler; Claire Johnson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

4.  An International Perspective on Pharmacy Student Selection Policies and Processes.

Authors:  John Shaw; Julia Kennedy; Maree Jensen; Janie Sheridan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.

Authors:  Robin L Corelli; Michael A Muchnik; Ryan J Beechinor; Gary Fong; Eleanor M Vogt; Jennifer M Cocohoba; Candy Tsourounis; Karen Suchanek Hudmon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: evidence from three longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Filip Lievens; Máire Kerrin; Neil Munro; Bill Irish
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Multiple Mini-Interview Performance Predicts Academic Difficulty in the PharmD Curriculum.

Authors:  Seth D Heldenbrand; Schwanda K Flowers; Bryan J Bordelon; Paul O Gubbins; Catherine O'Brien; Cindy D Stowe; Bradley C Martin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Use of Cognitive Simulation During Anesthesiology Resident Applicant Interviews to Assess Higher-Order Thinking.

Authors:  Alan W Kulig; Rebecca D Blanchard
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-07

9.  Mini Surgical Simulation, Role Play, and Group and Behavioral Interviews in Resident Selection.

Authors:  Dotun Ogunyemi; Carolyn Alexander; Edward Tangchitnob; David Seil Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-07

10.  An Examination of Correlations between MMI scores and Pharmacy School GPA.

Authors:  Kevin Cowart; Kamila Dell; Nazach Rodriguez-Snapp; Heather M W Petrelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.