Literature DB >> 27667835

An Examination of Correlations between MMI scores and Pharmacy School GPA.

Kevin Cowart1, Kamila Dell2, Nazach Rodriguez-Snapp2, Heather M W Petrelli2.   

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the correlation of mean admission multiple mini-interview (MMI) scores with cumulative and overall GPA across didactic years 1-3 in the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum. Methods. The mean admission MMI score and cumulative and overall GPA for first year (P1), second year (P2), and third year (P3) students in the PharmD curriculum was used to conduct a multiple regression analysis and to calculate a Pearson correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, v20. Results. A negative correlation between mean admission MMI and overall GPA was observed for P1 students and P2 students. A significant positive correlation was observed between mean admission MMI and overall GPA for P3 students. Conclusion. A weak association between mean admission MMI score and GPA was observed, and the direction of the association between MMI and GPA was mixed across cohorts of students in the PharmD curriculum. Further research is needed that includes measurement of noncognitive outcomes and continued validation of the MMI for use in pharmacy school admissions.

Keywords:  grade point average; multiple mini-interview; pharmacy admissions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667835      PMCID: PMC5023990          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  7 in total

1.  Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program.

Authors:  Andrea J Cameron; Linda D Mackeigan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Predictors of academic success in a doctor of pharmacy program.

Authors:  Kenneth L McCall; David D Allen; David S Fike
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance.

Authors:  Harold I Reiter; Kevin W Eva; Jack Rosenfeld; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review.

Authors:  Allan Pau; Kamalan Jeevaratnam; Yu Sui Chen; Abdoul Aziz Fall; Charmaine Khoo; Vishna Devi Nadarajah
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Harold I Reiter; Kien Trinh; Parveen Wasi; Jack Rosenfeld; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Development and Assessment of the Multiple Mini-Interview in a School of Pharmacy Admissions Model.

Authors:  Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; David Singer; Margaret Lewis; Melissa M Dinkins
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  The relationship between interviewers' characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Harold I Reiter; Jack Rosenfeld; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.893

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  A Plea for Psychometric Rigor.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Lisa M Hayes
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  A brief history of pharmacy admissions in North America.

Authors:  Erin Davis; Richard Braha; Shannon McAlorum; Debbie Kelly
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2019-08-05

3.  A Five-Minute Situational Judgment Test to Assess Empathy in First-Year Student Pharmacists.

Authors:  Michael D Wolcott; Carly Lupton-Smith; Wendy C Cox; Jacqueline E McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  More Than Their Test Scores: Redefining Success with Multiple Mini-Interviews.

Authors:  Ann Blair Kennedy; Cindy Nessim Youssef Riyad; Laura H Gunn; April Gant Brown; Kandyce Brooke Dunlap; Melissa Elizabeth Knutsen; Alicia Anne Dahl
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-07-02

5.  Are different station formats assessing different dimensions in multiple mini-interviews? Findings from the Canadian integrated French multiple mini-interviews.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Leduc; Sébastien Béland; Jean-Sébastien Renaud; Philippe Bégin; Robert Gagnon; Annie Ouellet; Christian Bourdy; Nathalie Loye
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.263

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.