Literature DB >> 19656504

The influence of anxiety on the initial selection of emotional faces presented in binocular rivalry.

Katie L H Gray1, Wendy J Adams, Matthew Garner.   

Abstract

Neurocognitive theories of anxiety predict that threat-related information can be evaluated before attentional selection, and can influence behaviour differentially in high anxious compared to low anxious individuals. We investigate this further by presenting emotional and neutral faces in an adapted binocular rivalry paradigm. We show that the initial selection of emotional faces presented in binocular rivalry is highly influenced by self-reported state and trait anxiety-level. Heightened anxiety was correlated with increased perception of angry and fearful faces, and decreased perception of happy expressions. These results are consistent with recent evidence of involuntary selection of threat in anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656504     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  9 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Through the eyes of anxiety: Dissecting threat bias via emotional-binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Neomi Singer; Mariam Eapen; Christian Grillon; Leslie G Ungerleider; Talma Hendler
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-03-05

3.  Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Unconscious evaluation of faces on social dimensions.

Authors:  Lorna H Stewart; Sara Ajina; Spas Getov; Bahador Bahrami; Alexander Todorov; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-04-02

5.  Onset rivalry: the initial dominance phase is independent of ongoing perceptual alternations.

Authors:  Jody Stanley; Jason D Forte; Patrick Cavanagh; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Both physical exercise and progressive muscle relaxation reduce the facing-the-viewer bias in biological motion perception.

Authors:  Adam Heenan; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Tactile input and empathy modulate the perception of ambiguous biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmetjan Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-20

Review 8.  Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Human brain structure predicts individual differences in preconscious evaluation of facial dominance and trustworthiness.

Authors:  Spas Getov; Ryota Kanai; Bahador Bahrami; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.436

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.