Literature DB >> 22390706

Through the eyes of anxiety: Dissecting threat bias via emotional-binocular rivalry.

Neomi Singer1, Mariam Eapen, Christian Grillon, Leslie G Ungerleider, Talma Hendler.   

Abstract

An extensive body of research has demonstrated that anxious individuals abnormally process threat-related content. Yet, the manner in which clinical anxiety affects the selection of threatening signals and their maintenance within consciousness is yet to be explored. The present study used an emotional binocular rivalry (e-BR) procedure, in which pictures of faces depicting either fearful or neutral expressions competed with pictures of a house for conscious perception. We assumed that first- or cumulative-preferred perception of faces with fearful over neutral expression (i.e., initial or sustained threat bias, respectively) stand for preferential selection or maintenance of fear content in awareness, correspondingly. Unmedicated patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and panic disorder (PAD) were compared to healthy controls for threat-related perceptual biases in the e-BR. At first perception of face, both SAD and PAD patients showed a greater initial threat bias than healthy controls. In contrast, at cumulative dwell-time of face, patient groups demonstrated a diminished sustained threat bias relative to healthy controls, yet in a different manner. SAD patients showed a sustained threat bias, though it was smaller than in healthy controls. Furthermore, increased levels of reported anxiety among SAD patients were associated with enhanced sustained perception of neutral faces. PAD patients, on the other hand, showed no sustained threat bias and a diminished cumulative perception of fearful faces with increased levels of anxiety traits. These findings indicate that anxiety disorders commonly involve an initially enhanced selection of threat signals into awareness, followed by disorder-specific manifestation of diminished preferred maintenance of threat in awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390706      PMCID: PMC3468657          DOI: 10.1037/a0027070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  56 in total

1.  Preattentive bias for emotional information in panic disorder with agoraphobia.

Authors:  L G Lundh; J Wikström; J Westerlund; L G Ost
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  Proximate and evolutionary studies of anxiety, stress and depression: synergy at the interface.

Authors:  R M Nesse
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Selective attention for cardiac information in panic patients.

Authors:  S Kroeze; M A van den Hout
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2000-01

Review 4.  Visual competition.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention.

Authors:  L Pessoa; M McKenna; E Gutierrez; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A cross-cultural study of perceptual predominance in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  J W BAGBY
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1957-05

Review 7.  Information processing in social phobia.

Authors:  David M Clark; Freda McManus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  B P Bradley; K Mogg; J White; C Groom; J de Bono
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-09

9.  Social phobia and interpretation of social events.

Authors:  L Stopa; D M Clark
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2000-03

10.  Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2002-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  Does valence influence perceptual bias towards incongruence during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Angel Anna Zacharia; Navdeep Ahuja; Simran Kaur; Nalin Mehta; Ratna Sharma
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-02-21

2.  Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Surprising Threats Accelerate Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  The neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions: fundamental questions and strategies for future research.

Authors:  Hadas Okon-Singer; Talma Hendler; Luiz Pessoa; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Both physical exercise and progressive muscle relaxation reduce the facing-the-viewer bias in biological motion perception.

Authors:  Adam Heenan; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tactile input and empathy modulate the perception of ambiguous biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmetjan Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-20

Review 7.  Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effect of intranasal oxytocin on visual processing and salience of human faces.

Authors:  Daniel Hovey; Louise Martens; Bruno Laeng; Siri Leknes; Lars Westberg
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 6.222

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.