Literature DB >> 19653045

Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer.

Amanda K Arrington1, Stephanie L Jarosek, Beth A Virnig, Elizabeth B Habermann, Todd M Tuttle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with unilateral breast cancer have an increased risk of developing contralateral breast cancer. A recent population-based study demonstrated that the proportion of patients with unilateral breast cancer in the United States who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has increased by 150% in recent years. The current study evaluated patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in a metropolitan-based hospital system to determine factors associated with CPM.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent surgical treatment for breast cancer in 2006 and 2007 in a single health care system, which included six different hospitals. Exclusion criteria included preoperative diagnosis of bilateral disease, stage IV disease, and a history of previous breast cancer. We recorded patient, treatment, tumor, and surgeon characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict CPM use.
RESULTS: Of 571 eligible patients, 276 (48.3%) underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 130 (22.8%) underwent unilateral mastectomy, and 165 (28.9%) underwent mastectomy and a CPM. Among mastectomy patients, 55.9% underwent CPM. Young age (<40 vs. >55 years), large tumor size (>5 vs. <2 cm), positive family history, lobular histology, multicentric disease, and surgeon gender (female) were independent predictors of increased CPM rates. Body mass index, tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, and preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging were not associated with increased CPM rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to evaluate specific surgeon characteristics associated with CPM use. Prospective studies are needed to examine factors affecting patient decision-making to develop resources that may assist patients in this process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19653045     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  65 in total

Review 1.  United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M Rueth; Andrea Abbott; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Effects of High Anxiety Scores on Surgical and Overall Treatment Plan in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Nathalie LeVasseur; Huaqi Li; Winson Cheung; Paula Myers; Elaine Mckevitt; Rebecca Warburton; Kaylie-Anne Willemsma; Adam Deruchie Tan; Stephen Chia; Christine Simmons
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  Surgical Management of Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Jennifer Steiman; Jessica R Schumacher; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Karen Sepucha; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Meghan E Meyer; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Mehra Golshan; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in young women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of predictive factors and clinical impact.

Authors:  A Bouchard-Fortier; N N Baxter; R Sutradhar; K Fernandes; X Camacho; P Graham; M L Quan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  B-Sure: a randomized pilot trial of an interactive web-based decision support aid versus usual care in average-risk breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Barbara L Smith; Sara Frederick; Anna Mitarotondo; Deborah A Kashy; Laurie J Kirstein
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is influenced by preoperative MRI recommendations.

Authors:  Chang Xia; Mary C Schroeder; Ronald J Weigel; Sonia L Sugg; Alexandra Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 trial: effect of breast MR imaging assessments and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Lucy G Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mary C Mahoney; Mitchell D Schnall; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cost of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Scott B Cantor; Melissa A Crosby; Wenli Dong; Yu Shen; Isabelle Bedrosian; Susan K Peterson; Patricia A Parker; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.