Literature DB >> 31615949

Effects of High Anxiety Scores on Surgical and Overall Treatment Plan in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Nathalie LeVasseur1, Huaqi Li2, Winson Cheung3, Paula Myers4, Elaine Mckevitt5, Rebecca Warburton5, Kaylie-Anne Willemsma6, Adam Deruchie Tan6, Stephen Chia7, Christine Simmons7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and high levels of anxiety often pursue more aggressive surgical interventions. The neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) setting could provide a window of opportunity to address patients' anxiety. However, the impact of anxiety on surgical decisions in the setting of NAT for breast cancer has not been previously studied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database of patients with breast cancer treated with NAT at BC Cancer was used to identify patients treated with NAT and subsequent surgical resection. Patients with bilateral breast cancer or BRCA mutations or those referred to the hereditary cancer program were excluded. An anxiety score of 0-3 was assigned based on responses to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Psychosocial Screen for Cancer. Clinicopathological information and treatment data were retrieved and cross-referenced between the low-anxiety (scores 0-1) and high-anxiety (scores 2-3) cohorts.
RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 203 patients met eligibility criteria. Of these, 93 patients (45.8%) had low anxiety and 110 patients (54.2%) had high anxiety. Overall, 161 patients (79.3%) had locally advanced cancers; no differences in stage, grade, or biomarkers were found between the low- and high-anxiety cohorts. Patients with high self-reported anxiety at initial consultation were younger (mean 56 years vs. 60 years; p = .011) and more likely to undergo mastectomy for breast-conserving surgery-eligible disease and bilateral mastectomy for unilateral disease compared with those with low anxiety (37.3% vs. 18.3%; likelihood ratio 9.15; p = .002). No significant differences in treatment timelines were identified between the two cohorts.
CONCLUSION: Patients with high anxiety at initial consultation were nine times more likely to undergo aggressive surgery compared with patients with low anxiety. These findings underscore the need for early identification of patients who may benefit from tailored supportive and educational services to address sources of anxiety and knowledge gaps. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The prevalence of anxiety among women with newly diagnosed breast cancer is being increasingly acknowledged. However, health care providers have not fully appreciated the impact of anxiety on the surgical management of patients with early-stage breast cancer. This study highlights the importance of self-reported anxiety on surgical management. The preoperative period provides a unique window of opportunity to address sources of anxiety and provide targeted educational materials over a period of 4-6 months, which may ultimately lead to less aggressive surgery when it is not needed. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Early‐stage breast cancer; Preoperative treatment; Psychooncology; Surgical treatment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31615949     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  19 in total

1.  Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Anxiety, Knowledge and Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Isabelle Bedrosian; Katherine Yao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Prospective Study of Surgical Decision-making Processes for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Susan K Peterson; Isabelle Bedrosian; Melissa A Crosby; Yu Shen; Dalliah M Black; Gildy Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Jun Ying; Wenli Dong; Scott B Cantor; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, in lung cancer patients: effects on pain, fatigue, and common problems--secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Amy Waller; Shannon L Groff; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients.

Authors:  E Bruera; N Kuehn; M J Miller; P Selmser; K Macmillan
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Emotional Distress Increases the Likelihood of Undergoing Surgery among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Willie Underwood; Caitlin Biddle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The relationship between anxiety and time to treatment for patients with prostate cancer on surveillance.

Authors:  David M Latini; Stacey L Hart; Sara J Knight; Janet E Cowan; Phillip L Ross; Janeen Duchane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Max S Mano; Sibylle Loibl; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Michael Untch; Norman Wolmark; Priya Rastogi; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andres Redondo; Hans H Fischer; William Jacot; Alison K Conlin; Claudia Arce-Salinas; Irene L Wapnir; Christian Jackisch; Michael P DiGiovanna; Peter A Fasching; John P Crown; Pia Wülfing; Zhimin Shao; Elena Rota Caremoli; Haiyan Wu; Lisa H Lam; David Tesarowski; Melanie Smitt; Hannah Douthwaite; Stina M Singel; Charles E Geyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 9.  Anxiety in cancer patients.

Authors:  D P Stark; A House
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The psychosocial screen for cancer (PSSCAN): further validation and normative data.

Authors:  Wolfgang Linden; A Andrea Vodermaier; Regina McKenzie; Maria C Barroetavena; Dahyun Yi; Richard Doll
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.