Literature DB >> 24809301

Cost of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Ashish A Deshmukh1, Scott B Cantor, Melissa A Crosby, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Susan K Peterson, Patricia A Parker, Abenaa M Brewster.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the healthcare costs of women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) with those of women who did not.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 904 women treated for stage I-III breast cancer with or without CPM. Women were matched according to age, year at diagnosis, stage, and receipt of chemotherapy. We included healthcare costs starting from the date of surgery to 24 months. We identified whether care was immediate or delayed (CPM within 6 months or 6-24 months after initial surgery, respectively). Costs were converted to approximate Medicare reimbursement values and adjusted for inflation. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of CPM on total breast cancer care costs adjusting for patient characteristics and accounting for matched pairs.
RESULTS: The mean difference between the CPM and no-CPM matched groups was $3,573 (standard error [SE] $455) for professional costs, $4,176 (SE $1,724) for technical costs, and $7,749 (SE $2,069) for total costs. For immediate and delayed CPM, the mean difference for total costs was $6,528 (SE $2,243) and $16,744 (SE $5,017), respectively. In multivariable analysis, the CPM group had a statistically significant increase of 16.9 % in mean total costs compared with the no-CPM group (p < 0.0001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu-positive status, receipt of radiation, and reconstruction were associated with increases in total costs.
CONCLUSIONS: CPM significantly increases short-term healthcare costs for women with unilateral breast cancer. These patient-level cost results can be used for future studies that evaluate the influence of costs of CPM on decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24809301      PMCID: PMC4125517          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3759-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  27 in total

1.  Core-needle and surgical breast biopsy: comparison of three methods of assessing cost.

Authors:  J H Burkhardt; J H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: addressing peace of mind.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologists.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Jennifer A Palmer; Eric Nadler; Chihui Fang; Peter Ubel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: the significance of mastectomy type, reconstructive complications, and body appearance.

Authors:  Marlene H Frost; Jeffrey M Slezak; Nho V Tran; Constance I Williams; Joanne L Johnson; John E Woods; Paul M Petty; John H Donohue; Clive S Grant; Jeff A Sloan; Thomas A Sellers; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

Authors:  A Khoo; S S Kroll; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb; B J Baldwin; B G Wang; M A Schusterman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Rita Sakr; Sujata Patil; Inga Gurevich; Michelle Stempel; Michelle Sampson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Abenaa M Brewster; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker; Wenli Dong; Susan K Peterson; Scott B Cantor; Melissa Crosby; Yu Shen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Stephanie Jarosek; Elizabeth B Habermann; Amanda Arrington; Anasooya Abraham; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution.

Authors:  Natalie B Jones; John Wilson; Linda Kotur; Julie Stephens; William B Farrar; Doreen M Agnese
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of predischarge monitoring for apnea of prematurity.

Authors:  John A F Zupancic; Douglas K Richardson; Bernie J O'Brien; Eric C Eichenwald; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implications for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Jeremie D Oliver; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

2.  Longitudinal Study of Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery in Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David W Lim; Helene Retrouvey; Isabel Kerrebijn; Kate Butler; Anne C O'Neill; Tulin D Cil; Toni Zhong; Stefan O P Hofer; David R McCready; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The relationship between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction, complications, breast-related procedures, and costs: A population-based study of health insurance data.

Authors:  Mary C Schroeder; Yu-Yu Tien; Lillian M Erdahl; Ingrid M Lizarraga; Brahmendra R Viyyuri; Sonia L Sugg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Cost and Complications of Local Therapies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Jing Jiang; Ya-ChenTina Shih; Sharon H Giordano; Jinhai Huo; Reshma Jagsi; Adeyiza O Momoh; Abigail S Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Simona F Shaitelman; Thomas A Buchholz; Shervin M Shirvani
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Better contralateral breast cancer risk estimation and alternative options to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Kalatu R Davies; Scott B Cantor; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-04

Review 6.  Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: review of risk factors and risk-reducing strategies.

Authors:  N N Basu; L Barr; G L Ross; D G Evans
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-27

7.  Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Authors:  Maria K Venetis; Erina L MacGeorge; Dadrie F Baptiste; Ashton Mouton; Lorin B Friley; Rebekah Pastor; Kristen Hatten; Janaka Lagoo; Monet W Bowling; Susan E Clare
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Cost effectiveness of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Michael G Schrauder; Lisa Brunel-Geuder; Lothar Häberle; Marius Wunderle; Juliane Hoyer; Roland Csorba; André Reis; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael P Lux
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.175

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.