Literature DB >> 28321479

Novel anatomical reconstruction of distal tibiofibular ligaments restores syndesmotic biomechanics.

Jian Che1,2, Chunbao Li3, Zhipeng Gao4, Wei Qi3, Binping Ji5, Yujie Liu6, Ming Han Lincoln Liow7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To date, there is a paucity of literature on syndesmotic reconstruction techniques that restore both anatomic stability and physiologic syndesmotic biomechanics. In this cadaveric study, (1) a novel syndesmotic reconstruction surgical technique using autogenous peroneus brevis tendon was described and (2) the biomechanical properties of the reconstruction was investigated.
METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen lower extremities were used in this study. Reconstruction of the anterior and posterior, as well as the interosseous tibiofibular ligaments was performed with a halved peroneus brevis tendon. Biomechanics were assessed using foot external rotation torque and ankle dorsiflexion axial loading tests, which were performed in (a) intact, (b) cut, (c) anatomically reconstructed syndesmotic ligaments, and (d) 3.5 mm tricortical syndesmotic screw fixation. Medial-lateral and anterior-posterior displacements of the distal fibula were recorded during foot external rotation and fibular axial displacement was recorded during ankle axial loading.
RESULTS: The fibula was displaced posteriorly and proximally with respect to the tibia in all specimens during external rotation and axial loading tests, respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in distal fibular displacements between anatomically reconstructed ligaments and screw fixation. Tricortical syndesmotic screw fixation resulted in 59% of posterior fibular displacement when compared to intact ligaments. No significant differences (n.s.) in distal fibular displacement were demonstrated between intact ligaments and anatomically reconstructed ligaments.
CONCLUSION: Anatomical reconstruction of the distal tibiofibular ligaments with the peroneus brevis tendon provides stability and recreates the biomechanical properties of an intact syndesmosis. This new surgical technique may be a viable alternative for the treatment of syndesmotic injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical reconstruction; Biomechanical cadaveric study; Distal tibiofibular ligaments; Surgical technique; Syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28321479     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4485-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  Late reconstruction of the anterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: good outcome in 9 patients.

Authors:  A Beumer; R P Heijboer; W P Fontijne; B A Swierstra
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-10

2.  Surgical strategies: doubled allograft reconstruction for chronic syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  James E Moravek; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Radiographic identification of the primary structures of the ankle syndesmosis.

Authors:  Brady T Williams; Evan W James; Kyle A Jisa; C Thomas Haytmanek; Robert F LaPrade; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Matthew W J Morris; Paul Rice; Timothy E Schneider
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture.

Authors:  Mélissa Laflamme; Etienne L Belzile; Luc Bédard; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Mark Glazebrook; Stéphane Pelet
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Stephen M Briggs; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation.

Authors:  Annechien Beumer; Martin M Campo; Ruud Niesing; Judd Day; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Bart A Swierstra
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures.

Authors:  Thomas H Jordan; Ross H Talarico; John M Schuberth
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw.

Authors:  N Hamid; B J Loeffler; W Braddy; J F Kellam; B E Cohen; M J Bosse
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

10.  Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Heng Zhao; Li-Qun Zhang; Greg Strohmeyer; Anand Vora
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.827

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reconstruction of Chronic Injured Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis with Autogenous Tendon Graft: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Han-Lin Xu; Yu-Jie Song; Ying-Hui Hua
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Syndesmotic malreduction may decrease fixation stability: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Lu Bai; Wentao Zhang; Siyao Guan; Jianxin Liu; Peng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Owen Nelson; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.