Literature DB >> 19650717

The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.

E Spencer Williams1, Julie Panko, Dennis J Paustenbach.   

Abstract

In 2006, the European Union (EU) promulgated a monumental regulatory initiative for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). To date, several thousand pages of text have been needed to describe the expectations of this regulation. There were numerous reasons for the promulgation of REACH, but, by and large, it is an extension of the global desire to produce fewer industrial chemicals, to understand the possible human and ecological hazards of those that are produced, and to insure that any major threat is anticipated, as well as prevented. Most industry-related groups consider it the most wide-ranging and costly regulatory initiatives related to health risk assessment ever to be promulgated. This review presents a description of REACH that should inform scientists, managers, and others about its objectives and the means to satisfy them. Registration is required for all chemicals manufactured or imported into the EU, unless specifically exempted. Registration is expected to be a collaborative process among companies, which will generate a dossier containing data on physicochemical characteristics, as well as toxicological and ecotoxicological properties. Though the magnitude of the gaps in the data required for registration is uncertain at this point, it is clear that basic toxicology testing will have to be conducted for many chemical substances that have not undergone formal review up to this point. For many chemicals, an examination of hazards and risks arising from the use of these substances will also be required in the form of a chemical safety report (CSR). Beginning with the dual processes of dossier and substance evaluation, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), the Member States of the EU, and the European Commission will identify chemicals that may pose unacceptable hazards to human health and/or the environment, and will curtail or restrict their usage. The implementation of REACH will expand and deepen the fields of applied toxicology and exposure assessment by spurring activity and innovation in sampling and analysis, toxicology testing, exposure modeling, alternative toxicity testing, and risk assessment practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19650717     DOI: 10.1080/10408440903036056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  17 in total

Review 1.  Stem cells and stem cell-derived tissues and their use in safety assessment.

Authors:  Kyle Kolaja
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Modeling bioconcentration factor (BCF) using mechanistically interpretable descriptors computed from open source tool "PaDEL-Descriptor".

Authors:  Subrata Pramanik; Kunal Roy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  In silico prediction of the developmental toxicity of diverse organic chemicals in rodents for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Shikha Gupta; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  The dilemmas of science for policy: Scientific evidence and the consequences of regulatory options in risk and benefit assessment.

Authors:  José Luis Luján; Oliver Todt
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Anna Lowit; David Allen; Warren Casey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Single-cell ELISA and flow cytometry as methods for highlighting potential neuronal and astrocytic toxicant specificity.

Authors:  E K Woehrling; E J Hill; E E Torr; M D Coleman
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.911

7.  Predictive QSAR modelling of algal toxicity of ionic liquids and its interspecies correlation with Daphnia toxicity.

Authors:  Kunal Roy; Rudra Narayan Das; Paul L A Popelier
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Characterization of Compositional Variability in Petroleum Substances.

Authors:  Alina T Roman-Hubers; Alexandra C Cordova; Arlean M Rohde; Weihsueh A Chiu; Thomas J McDonald; Fred A Wright; James N Dodds; Erin S Baker; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Fuel (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.609

9.  Structure-activity relationship models for rat carcinogenesis and assessing the role mutagens play in model predictivity.

Authors:  C A Carrasquer; K Batey; S Qamar; A R Cunningham; S L Cunningham
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  QSAR modeling for predicting reproductive toxicity of chemicals in rats for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Shikha Gupta; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.