Literature DB >> 19647473

Data assimilation using a gradient descent method for estimation of intraoperative brain deformation.

Songbai Ji1, Alex Hartov, David Roberts, Keith Paulsen.   

Abstract

Biomechanical models that simulate brain deformation are gaining attention as alternatives for brain shift compensation. One approach, known as the "forced-displacement method", constrains the model to exactly match the measured data through boundary condition (BC) assignment. Although it improves model estimates and is computationally attractive, the method generates fictitious forces and may be ill-advised due to measurement uncertainty. Previously, we have shown that by assimilating intraoperatively acquired brain displacements in an inversion scheme, the Representer algorithm (REP) is able to maintain stress-free BCs and improve model estimates by 33% over those without data guidance in a controlled environment. However, REP is computationally efficient only when a few data points are used for model guidance because its costs scale linearly in the number of data points assimilated, thereby limiting its utility (and accuracy) in clinical settings. In this paper, we present a steepest gradient descent algorithm (SGD) whose computational complexity scales nearly invariantly with the number of measurements assimilated by iteratively adjusting the forcing conditions to minimize the difference between measured and model-estimated displacements (model-data misfit). Solutions of full linear systems of equations are achieved with a parallelized direct solver on a shared-memory, eight-processor Linux cluster. We summarize the error contributions from the entire process of model-updated image registration compensation and we show that SGD is able to attain model estimates comparable to or better than those obtained with REP, capturing about 74-82% of tumor displacement, but with a computational effort that is significantly less (a factor of 4-fold or more reduction relative to REP) and nearly invariant to the amount of sparse data involved when the number of points assimilated is large. Based on five patient cases, an average computational cost of approximately 2 min for estimating whole-brain deformation has been achieved with SGD using 100 sparse data points, suggesting the new algorithm is sufficiently fast with adequate accuracy for routine use in the operating room (OR).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647473      PMCID: PMC2749709          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2009.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  41 in total

1.  Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery.

Authors:  R M Comeau; A F Sadikot; A Fenster; T M Peters
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Displacement estimation with co-registered ultrasound for image guided neurosurgery: a quantitative in vivo porcine study.

Authors:  Karen E Lunn; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; John D West
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  In vivo quantification of retraction deformation modeling for updated image-guidance during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Leah A Platenik; Michael I Miga; David W Roberts; Karen E Lunn; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 4.  Application of soft tissue modelling to image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Timothy J Carter; Maxime Sermesant; David M Cash; Dean C Barratt; Christine Tanner; David J Hawkes
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases--comparison of image interpretations with histopathology.

Authors:  G Unsgaard; T Selbekk; T Brostrup Müller; S Ommedal; S H Torp; G Myhr; J Bang; T A Nagelhus Hernes
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Adaptive model initialization and deformation for automatic segmentation of T1-weighted brain MRI data.

Authors:  Ziji Wu; Keith D Paulsen; John M Sullivan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Data-guided brain deformation modeling: evaluation of a 3-D adjoint inversion method in porcine studies.

Authors:  Karen E Lunn; Keith D Paulsen; Fenghong Liu; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; David W Roberts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Brain-skull contact boundary conditions in an inverse computational deformation model.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; David W Roberts; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Accuracy of registration methods in frameless stereotaxis.

Authors:  P A Helm; T S Eckel
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1998

10.  Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets.

Authors:  K S Arun; T S Huang; S D Blostein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.226

View more
  13 in total

1.  Estimation of brain deformation for volumetric image updating in protoporphyrin IX fluorescence-guided resection.

Authors:  Pablo A Valdés; Xiaoyao Fan; Songbai Ji; Brent T Harris; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Brain-skull contact boundary conditions in an inverse computational deformation model.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; David W Roberts; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Android application for determining surgical variables in brain-tumor resection procedures.

Authors:  Rohan C Vijayan; Reid C Thompson; Lola B Chambless; Peter J Morone; Le He; Logan W Clements; Rebekah H Griesenauer; Hakmook Kang; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-02

4.  Image Updating for Brain Shift Compensation During Resection.

Authors:  Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Jonathan D Olson; Songbai Ji; Timothy J Schaewe; David A Simon; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  Intraoperative fiducial-less patient registration using volumetric 3D ultrasound: a prospective series of 32 neurosurgical cases.

Authors:  Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Songbai Ji; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Augmenting Surgery via Multi-scale Modeling and Translational Systems Biology in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.

Authors:  Ghassan S Kassab; Gary An; Edward A Sander; Michael I Miga; Julius M Guccione; Songbai Ji; Yoram Vodovotz
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Computational Modeling for Enhancing Soft Tissue Image Guided Surgery: An Application in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Michael I Miga
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  3D XFEM-based modeling of retraction for preoperative image update.

Authors:  Lara M Vigneron; Simon K Warfield; Pierre A Robe; Jacques G Verly
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2011

9.  Stereovision to MR image registration for cortical surface displacement mapping to enhance image-guided neurosurgery.

Authors:  Xiaoyao Fan; Songbai Ji; Alex Hartov; David W Roberts; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Volumetric intraoperative brain deformation compensation: model development and phantom validation.

Authors:  Christine DeLorenzo; Xenophon Papademetris; Lawrence H Staib; Kenneth P Vives; Dennis D Spencer; James S Duncan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.