Xiaoyao Fan1, Songbai Ji2, Alex Hartov3, David W Roberts4, Keith D Paulsen5. 1. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755. 2. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 and Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755. 3. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755 and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756. 4. Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756; and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756. 5. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755; Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756; and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A surface registration method is presented to align intraoperative stereovision (iSV) with preoperative magnetic resonance (pMR) images, which utilizes both geometry and texture information to extract tissue displacements as part of the overall process of compensating for intraoperative brain deformation in order to maintain accurate neuronavigational image guidance during surgery. METHODS: A sum-of-squared-difference rigid image registration was first executed to detect lateral shift of the cortical surface and was followed by a mutual-information-based block matching method to detect local nonrigid deformation caused by distention or collapse of the cortical surface. Ten (N = 10) surgical cases were evaluated in which an independent point measurement of a dominant cortical surface feature location was recorded with a tracked stylus in each case and compared to its surface-registered counterpart. The full three-dimensional (3D) displacement field was also extracted to drive a biomechanical brain deformation model, the results of which were reconciled with the reconstructed iSV surface as another form of evaluation. RESULTS: Differences between the tracked stylus coordinates of cortical surface features and their surface-registered locations were 1.94 ± 0.59 mm on average across the ten cases. When the complete displacement map derived from surface registration was utilized, the resulting images generated from mechanical model updates were consistent in terms of both geometry (1-2 mm of model misfit) and texture, and were generated with less than 10 min of computational time. Analysis of the surface-registered 3D displacements indicate that the magnitude of motion ranged from 4.03 to 9.79 mm in the ten patient cases, and the amount of lateral shift was not related statistically to the direction of gravity (p = 0.73 ≫ 0.05) or the craniotomy size (p = 0.48 ≫ 0.05) at the beginning of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The iSV-pMR surface registration method utilizes texture and geometry information to extract both global lateral shift and local nonrigid movement of the cortical surface in 3D. The results suggest small differences exist in surface-registered locations when compared to positions measured independently with a coregistered stylus and when the full iSV surface was aligned with model-updated MR. The effectiveness and efficiency of the registration method is also minimally disruptive to surgical workflow.
PURPOSE: A surface registration method is presented to align intraoperative stereovision (iSV) with preoperative magnetic resonance (pMR) images, which utilizes both geometry and texture information to extract tissue displacements as part of the overall process of compensating for intraoperative brain deformation in order to maintain accurate neuronavigational image guidance during surgery. METHODS: A sum-of-squared-difference rigid image registration was first executed to detect lateral shift of the cortical surface and was followed by a mutual-information-based block matching method to detect local nonrigid deformation caused by distention or collapse of the cortical surface. Ten (N = 10) surgical cases were evaluated in which an independent point measurement of a dominant cortical surface feature location was recorded with a tracked stylus in each case and compared to its surface-registered counterpart. The full three-dimensional (3D) displacement field was also extracted to drive a biomechanical brain deformation model, the results of which were reconciled with the reconstructed iSV surface as another form of evaluation. RESULTS: Differences between the tracked stylus coordinates of cortical surface features and their surface-registered locations were 1.94 ± 0.59 mm on average across the ten cases. When the complete displacement map derived from surface registration was utilized, the resulting images generated from mechanical model updates were consistent in terms of both geometry (1-2 mm of model misfit) and texture, and were generated with less than 10 min of computational time. Analysis of the surface-registered 3D displacements indicate that the magnitude of motion ranged from 4.03 to 9.79 mm in the ten patient cases, and the amount of lateral shift was not related statistically to the direction of gravity (p = 0.73 ≫ 0.05) or the craniotomy size (p = 0.48 ≫ 0.05) at the beginning of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The iSV-pMR surface registration method utilizes texture and geometry information to extract both global lateral shift and local nonrigid movement of the cortical surface in 3D. The results suggest small differences exist in surface-registered locations when compared to positions measured independently with a coregistered stylus and when the full iSV surface was aligned with model-updated MR. The effectiveness and efficiency of the registration method is also minimally disruptive to surgical workflow.
Authors: Michael I Miga; Tuhin K Sinha; David M Cash; Robert L Galloway; Robert J Weil Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Michael I Miga; Andreas Staubert; Keith D Paulsen; Francis E Kennedy; Volker M Tronnier; David W Roberts; Alex Hartov; Leah A Platenik; Karen E Lunn Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2000-10
Authors: Timothy J Carter; Maxime Sermesant; David M Cash; Dean C Barratt; Christine Tanner; David J Hawkes Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2005-11-03 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Karen E Lunn; Keith D Paulsen; Daniel R Lynch; David W Roberts; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Karen E Lunn; Keith D Paulsen; Fenghong Liu; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; David W Roberts Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: David W Roberts; Jonathan D Olson; Linton T Evans; Kolbein K Kolste; Stephen C Kanick; Xiaoyao Fan; Jaime J Bravo; Brian C Wilson; Frederic Leblond; Mikael Marois; Keith D Paulsen Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Jonathan D Olson; Songbai Ji; Timothy J Schaewe; David A Simon; Keith D Paulsen Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Songbai Ji; Xiaoyao Fan; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Sohail K Mirza; S Scott Lollis Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Linton Evans; Jonathan D Olson; Yunliang Cai; Xiaoyao Fan; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Songbai Ji; S Scott Lollis Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: S Scott Lollis; Xiaoyao Fan; Linton Evans; Jonathan D Olson; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Sohail K Mirza; Songbai Ji Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Timothy J Schaewe; Songbai Ji; Leslie H Holton; David A Simon; Keith D Paulsen Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 5.115