INTRODUCTION: Fluorescence-guided resection (FGR) of brain tumors is an intuitive, practical and emerging technology for visually delineating neoplastic tissue exposed intraoperatively. Image guidance is the standard technique for producing 3-dimensional spatially coregistered information for surgical decision making. Both technologies together are synergistic: the former detects surface fluorescence as a biomarker of the current surgical margin while the latter shows coregistered volumetric neuroanatomy but can be degraded by intraoperative brain shift. We present the implementation of deformation modeling for brain shift compensation in protoporphyrin IX FGR, integrating these two sources of information for maximum surgical benefit. METHODS: Two patients underwent FGR coregistered with conventional image guidance. Histopathological analysis, intraoperative fluorescence and image space coordinates were recorded for biopsy specimens acquired during surgery. A biomechanical brain deformation model driven by intraoperative ultrasound data was used to generate updated MR images. RESULTS: Combined use of fluorescence signatures and updated MR image information showed substantially improved accuracy compared to fluorescence or the original (i.e., nonupdated) MR images, detecting only true positives and true negatives, and no instances of false positives or false negatives. CONCLUSION: Implementation of brain deformation modeling in FGR shows promise for increasing the accuracy of neurosurgical guidance in the delineation and resection of brain tumors. 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
INTRODUCTION: Fluorescence-guided resection (FGR) of brain tumors is an intuitive, practical and emerging technology for visually delineating neoplastic tissue exposed intraoperatively. Image guidance is the standard technique for producing 3-dimensional spatially coregistered information for surgical decision making. Both technologies together are synergistic: the former detects surface fluorescence as a biomarker of the current surgical margin while the latter shows coregistered volumetric neuroanatomy but can be degraded by intraoperative brain shift. We present the implementation of deformation modeling for brain shift compensation in protoporphyrin IX FGR, integrating these two sources of information for maximum surgical benefit. METHODS: Two patients underwent FGR coregistered with conventional image guidance. Histopathological analysis, intraoperative fluorescence and image space coordinates were recorded for biopsy specimens acquired during surgery. A biomechanical brain deformation model driven by intraoperative ultrasound data was used to generate updated MR images. RESULTS: Combined use of fluorescence signatures and updated MR image information showed substantially improved accuracy compared to fluorescence or the original (i.e., nonupdated) MR images, detecting only true positives and true negatives, and no instances of false positives or false negatives. CONCLUSION: Implementation of brain deformation modeling in FGR shows promise for increasing the accuracy of neurosurgical guidance in the delineation and resection of brain tumors. 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Hai Sun; Karen E Lunn; Hany Farid; Ziji Wu; David W Roberts; Alex Hartov; Keith D Paulsen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Karen E Lunn; Keith D Paulsen; Fenghong Liu; Francis E Kennedy; Alex Hartov; David W Roberts Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Steven A Toms; Wei-Chiang Lin; Robert J Weil; Mahlon D Johnson; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Summer L Gibbs-Strauss; Harold H Yang; S Khan Hekmatyar; P Jack Hoopes; Julia A O'Hara; Risto A Kauppinen; Brian W Pogue Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Jonathan D Olson; Songbai Ji; Timothy J Schaewe; David A Simon; Keith D Paulsen Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Pablo A Valdés; Ziev B Moses; Anthony Kim; Clifford J Belden; Brian C Wilson; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Brent T Harris Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: David W Roberts; Pablo A Valdés; Brent T Harris; Kathryn M Fontaine; Alexander Hartov; Xiaoyao Fan; Songbai Ji; S Scott Lollis; Brian W Pogue; Frederic Leblond; Tor D Tosteson; Brian C Wilson; Keith D Paulsen Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Pablo A Valdés; Anthony Kim; Frederic Leblond; Olga M Conde; Brent T Harris; Keith D Paulsen; Brian C Wilson; David W Roberts Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Pablo A Valdés; Valerie Jacobs; Brent T Harris; Brian C Wilson; Frederic Leblond; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Pablo A Valdes; Kimon Bekelis; Brent T Harris; Brian C Wilson; Frederic Leblond; Anthony Kim; Nathan E Simmons; Kadir Erkmen; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: David W Roberts; Pablo A Valdés; Brent T Harris; Alexander Hartov; Xiaoyao Fan; Songbai Ji; Brian W Pogue; Frederic Leblond; Tor D Tosteson; Brian C Wilson; Keith D Paulsen Journal: Clin Neurosurg Date: 2012
Authors: Xiaoyao Fan; David W Roberts; Timothy J Schaewe; Songbai Ji; Leslie H Holton; David A Simon; Keith D Paulsen Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 5.115