Literature DB >> 19636023

Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era.

Andrew J Stephenson1, Michael W Kattan, James A Eastham, Fernando J Bianco, Ofer Yossepowitch, Andrew J Vickers, Eric A Klein, David P Wood, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The long-term risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after radical prostatectomy is poorly defined for patients treated in the era of widespread prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Models that predict the risk of PCSM are needed for patient counseling and clinical trial design.
METHODS: A multi-institutional cohort of 12,677 patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2005 was analyzed for the risk of PCSM. Patient clinical information and treatment outcome was modeled using Fine and Gray competing risk regression analysis to predict PCSM.
RESULTS: Fifteen-year PCSM and all-cause mortality were 12% and 38%, respectively. The estimated PCSM ranged from 5% to 38% for patients in the lowest and highest quartiles of predicted risk of PSA-defined recurrence, based on a popular nomogram. Biopsy Gleason grade, PSA, and year of surgery were associated with PCSM. A nomogram predicting the 15-year risk of PCSM was developed, and the externally validated concordance index was 0.82. Neither preoperative PSA velocity nor body mass index improved the model's accuracy. Only 4% of contemporary patients had a predicted 15-year PCSM of greater than 5%.
CONCLUSION: Few patients will die from prostate cancer within 15 years of radical prostatectomy, despite the presence of adverse clinical features. This favorable prognosis may be related to the effectiveness of radical prostatectomy (with or without secondary therapy) or the low lethality of screen-detected cancers. Given the limited ability to identify contemporary patients at substantially elevated risk of PCSM on the basis of clinical features alone, the need for novel markers specifically associated with the biology of lethal prostate cancer is evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636023      PMCID: PMC3651598          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Messing; J Manola; M Sarosdy; G Wilding; E D Crawford; D Trump
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Kimberly Walker-Thurmond; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparison of the efficacy of local therapies for localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a large single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Patrick A Kupelian; Mohamed Elshaikh; Chandana A Reddy; Craig Zippe; Eric A Klein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Rodney L Dunn; Jeff Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Laurel Northouse; Larry Hembroff; Xihong Lin; Thomas K Greenfield; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Arul Mahadevan; Eric Klein; Adam Kibel; Louis L Pisters; Deborah Kuban; Irving Kaplan; David Wood; Jay Ciezki; Nikhil Shah; John T Wei
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Marianna Zahurak; Steven Piantadosi; Johnathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Rob Boer; Suzie J Otto; Ingrid W van der Cruijsen; Ronald A M Damhuis; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Impact of previous local treatment for prostate cancer on subsequent metastatic disease.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Catherine Tangen; Joseph Basler; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Susan R Harlan; Matthew R Cooperberg; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Maxwell V Meng; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Corey A Carter; Timothy Donahue; Leon Sun; Hongyu Wu; David G McLeod; Christopher Amling; Raymond Lance; John Foley; Wade Sexton; Leo Kusuda; Andrew Chung; Douglas Soderdahl; Stephen Jackmaan; Judd W Moul
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  133 in total

1.  Radiation therapy in prostate cancer: a risk-adapted strategy.

Authors:  A J Hayden; C Catton; T Pickles
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Analysis of the correlation between endorectal MRI response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M D Galsky; W Xie; M Nakabayashi; R W Ross; F M Fennessy; C M Tempany; T K Choueiri; K Khine; P W Kantoff; M-E Taplin; W K Oh
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Interpretation of the prostate-specific antigen history in assessing life-threatening prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna E Kettermann; Luigi Ferrucci; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter; Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Vinod P Balachandran; Mithat Gonen; J Joshua Smith; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Lawrence D True; Philip May; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Bruce Dalkin; Daniel W Lin; Rodney A Schmidt; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  What is low-risk prostate cancer and what is its natural history?

Authors:  Helen O'Donnell; Chris Parker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Inherited genetic variant predisposes to aggressive but not indolent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Siqun Lilly Zheng; Sarah D Isaacs; Kathleen E Wiley; Fredrik Wiklund; Jielin Sun; A Karim Kader; Ge Li; Lina D Purcell; Seong-Tae Kim; Fang-Chi Hsu; Pär Stattin; Jonas Hugosson; Jan Adolfsson; Patrick C Walsh; Jeffrey M Trent; David Duggan; John Carpten; Henrik Grönberg; William B Isaacs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Prostate cancer risk assessment: choosing the sharpest tool in the shed.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Scott A Tomlins; Christine L Barnett; Todd M Morgan; James E Montie; John T Wei; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.