Literature DB >> 14581423

Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.

Corey A Carter1, Timothy Donahue, Leon Sun, Hongyu Wu, David G McLeod, Christopher Amling, Raymond Lance, John Foley, Wade Sexton, Leo Kusuda, Andrew Chung, Douglas Soderdahl, Stephen Jackmaan, Judd W Moul.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Watchful waiting (WW) is an acceptable strategy for managing prostate cancer (PC) in older men. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has resulted in a stage migration, with diagnoses made in younger men. An analysis of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research Database was undertaken to document younger men with low- or intermediate-grade PC who initially chose WW. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified men choosing WW who were diagnosed between January 1991 and January 2002, were 70 years or younger, had a Gleason score < or = 6 with no Gleason pattern 4, had no more than three positive cores on biopsy, and whose clinical stage was < or = T2 and PSA level was < or = 20. We analyzed their likelihood of remaining on WW, the factors associated with secondary treatment, and the influence of comorbidities.
RESULTS: Three hundred thirteen men were identified. Median follow-up time was 3.8 years. Median age was 65.4 years (range, 41 to 70 years). Ninety-eight patients remained on WW; 215 proceeded to treatment. A total of 57.3% and 73.2% chose treatment within the first 2 and 4 years, respectively. Median PSA doubling time (DT) was 2.5 years for those who underwent therapy; those remaining on WW had a median DT of 25.8 years. The type of secondary treatment was associated with the number of patient's comorbidities (P =.012).
CONCLUSION: Younger patients who choose WW seemed more likely to receive secondary treatment than older patients. PSA DTs often predict the use of secondary treatment. The number of comorbidities a patient has influences the type of secondary therapy chosen. The WW strategy may better be termed temporarily deferred therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14581423     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

Review 1.  [What can medicine expect from health economics?].

Authors:  E Bismarck; B J Schmitz-Dräger; O Schöffski
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Selective detection of histologically aggressive prostate cancer: an Early Detection Research Network Prediction model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies with validation in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Simpa Salami; Meredith M Regan; Donna P Ankerst; John T Wei; Mark A Rubin; Ian M Thompson; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: what have been the triggers for intervention?

Authors:  John J Coen; Adam S Feldman; Matthew R Smith; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Risk stratification of men choosing surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth S Tseng; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Ofer Yossepowitch; Andrew J Vickers; Eric A Klein; David P Wood; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  PSA doubling time versus PSA velocity to predict high-risk prostate cancer: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Anna Kettermann; Luigi Ferrucci; Patricia Landis; E Jeffrey Metter; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Pretreatment predictors of death from other causes in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicole L Simone; Anurag K Singh; Janet E Cowan; Benjamin P Soule; Peter R Carroll; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Low risk prostate cancer in men under age 65: the case for definitive treatment.

Authors:  Thomas L Jang; Ofer Yossepowitch; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Anna Kettermann; Christopher Warlick; E Jeffrey Metter; Patricia Landis; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Continuing controversy over monitoring men with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of programs in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; David Gunnell; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Athene Lane; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.