Literature DB >> 19633892

Development and validation of mental practice as a training strategy for laparoscopic surgery.

Sonal Arora1, Rajesh Aggarwal, Nick Sevdalis, Aidan Moran, Pramudith Sirimanna, Roger Kneebone, Ara Darzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns for patient safety have accelerated the need for alternative training strategies outside the operating room. Mental practice (MP: the use of mental imagery to rehearse a task symbolically before performance) has been used successfully in sports and music to enhance skill. This study aimed to develop and validate a MP training strategy for laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: A cognitive "walk through" was conducted for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to identify key visual, cognitive, and kinesthetic cues for the procedure. This was used to develop a MP training protocol featuring an "MP script" to enhance mental imagery of a LC. The script was validated by asking each subject to rehearse mentally a LC within 30 min. Ability to practice this procedure mentally was assessed before and after MP training with a modified version of a validated questionnaire (minimum score, 8; maximum score, 56).
RESULTS: The study was completed by 20 subjects (10 experienced surgeons >100 LCs, 10 novice surgeons <10 LCs). Reliability testing of the questionnaire gave it a Cronbach alpha of 0.984 (n = 20) before MP training and 0.879 (n = 20) after MP training, indicating internal consistency. The construct validity of the questionnaire is supported by the fact that the experienced surgeons scored higher on all the questions than the novices both before and after training. Significant improvement in global imagery score after MP was shown by both experienced (48 before MP vs. 53 after MP; p = 0.007) and novice (15 before MP vs. 42 after MP; p = 0.005) surgeons, suggesting both face and content validity.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to develop and validate MP as a novel training approach for laparoscopic surgery. Mental practice may be a time- and cost-effective strategy that improves surgeons' ability to visualize themselves performing a LC, increasing both their knowledge and confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633892     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0624-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery.

Authors:  R S Haluck; R L Marshall; T M Krummel; M G Melkonian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Linda Bardram; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Comparing the effects of physical practice and mental imagery rehearsal on learning basic surgical skills by medical students.

Authors:  Charles W Sanders; Mark Sadoski; Rachel Bramson; Robert Wiprud; Kim Van Walsum
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program?

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Tanya Tierney; Maria Woloshynowych; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

Review 8.  Imagery interventions in sport.

Authors:  S M Murphy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic warm-up exercises improve performance of senior-level trainees during laparoscopic renal surgery.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Phillip Mucksavage; David C Kerbl; Kathryn E Osann; Howard N Winfield; Kanav Kahol; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Microcomplications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on duration of surgery and costs.

Authors:  Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Salome Dell-Kuster; Henry Hoffmann; Urs von Holzen; Daniel Oertli; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Development and implementation of the Structured Training Trainer Assessment Report (STTAR) in the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Susannah M Wyles; Danilo Miskovic; Zhifang Ni; Ara W Darzi; Roland M Valori; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  High-resolution standardization reduces delay due to workflow disruptions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Sohelia Aghlmandi; Jasmin Zeindler; Debora Nowakowski; Christian A Nebiker; Christoph Kettelhack; Rachel Rosenthal; Raoul A Droeser; Savas D Soysal; Henry Hoffmann; Robert Mechera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hybrid simulation compared to manikin alone in teaching pelvic examinations: a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Kristyn Manley; Sian Edwards; Jane Mears; Dimitrios Siassakos
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 6.  Optimizing laparoscopic training efficacy by 'deconstruction into key steps': a randomized controlled trial with novice medical students.

Authors:  A Widder; J Backhaus; A Wierlemann; I Hering; S Flemming; M Hankir; C-T Germer; A Wiegering; J F Lock; S König; F Seyfried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Hypnosis-induced mental training improves performance on the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) simulator.

Authors:  Gideon Sroka; Zahi Arnon; Monica Laniado; Elad Schiff; Ibrahim Matter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Mental practice in postgraduate training: a randomized controlled trial in mastoidectomy skills.

Authors:  Anne Conlin; Jane Lea; Manohar Bance; Neil Chadha; Shaun Kilty; Frederick Kozak; Julian Savage; Ravindar Sidhu; Joseph Chen; Brian D Westerberg
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-09-15

9.  Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?

Authors:  Marina Yiasemidou; Raffaele Galli; Daniel Glassman; Matthew Tang; Rahoz Aziz; David Jayne; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected motor learning principles in physiotherapy and medical education.

Authors:  Martin Sattelmayer; Simone Elsig; Roger Hilfiker; Gillian Baer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.