Literature DB >> 19630582

Using virtual reality to assess young adult smokers' attention to cues.

Amy C Traylor1, Patrick S Bordnick, Brian L Carter.   

Abstract

Cigarette smokers, when confronted with cues associated with smoking, evidence strong reactions, including increased attentional bias toward those smoking-related cues. These reactions have not been extensively studied in young adult smokers, a group that research suggests may respond differently than adults or adolescent smokers. Furthermore, the impact of olfactory cues, such as cigarette smoke, on attentional bias has not been explored in young adult smokers. In this pilot study, 20 nicotine-dependent young adult smokers were randomized to receive scent cues or no scent cues and were exposed to four virtual reality (VR) rooms containing sensory and social content, including smoking or neutral cues. Participants entered a neutral VR room, followed by two different smoking VR rooms, and closed with the same neutral room. Subjective attention to smoking cues and thoughts about smoking responses were recorded upon exiting each room. Significant increases in attention to cues and thoughts about smoking were found when young adult smokers were exposed to VR smoking environments, but the inclusion of olfactory cues did not result in significantly higher attention to cues or thoughts about smoking. Results suggest that while further research is necessary to understand the impact of olfactory cues, VR appears to be an effective methodology for cue exposure studies exploring attentional bias in young adult smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19630582      PMCID: PMC4104935          DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav        ISSN: 1094-9313


  19 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Determinants and effects of attentional bias in smokers.

Authors:  A J Waters; C Feyerabend
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2000-06

3.  The cue-availability paradigm: the effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Attentional bias in drug dependence: vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers.

Authors:  Brendan P Bradley; Karin Mogg; Tamsin Wright; Matt Field
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2003-03

5.  Proust nose best: odors are better cues of autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Simon Chu; John J Downes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

6.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Rachel S Herz
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Michael A Sayette; Jean A Paty; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Assessing craving in young adult smokers using virtual reality.

Authors:  Amy C Traylor; Patrick S Bordnick; Brian L Carter
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

10.  Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Matt Field; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Counterbalancing in smoking cue research: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Kasey M Griffin; W Michael Sayers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Application of virtual reality methods to obesity prevention and management research.

Authors:  Susan Persky
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-01

3.  Behavioral economic analysis of cue-elicited craving for tobacco: a virtual reality study.

Authors:  John Acker; James MacKillop
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Cue reactivity in virtual reality: the role of context.

Authors:  Megan M Paris; Brian L Carter; Amy C Traylor; Patrick S Bordnick; Susan X Day; Mary W Armsworth; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Feasibility of Using Virtual Reality to Assess Nicotine Cue Reactivity During Treatment.

Authors:  Eili Kaganoff; Patrick S Bordnick; Brian Lee Carter
Journal:  Res Soc Work Pract       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 6.  Promising technological innovations in cognitive training to treat eating-related behavior.

Authors:  Evan M Forman; Stephanie P Goldstein; Daniel Flack; Brittney C Evans; Stephanie M Manasse; Cara Dochat
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 7.  What virtual reality research in addictions can tell us about the future of obesity assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Patrick S Bordnick; Brian L Carter; Amy C Traylor
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-01

8.  Comparison of the effectiveness of virtual cue exposure therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Chan-Bin Park; Jung-Seok Choi; Su Mi Park; Jun-Young Lee; Hee Yeon Jung; Jin-Mi Seol; Jae Yeon Hwang; Ah Reum Gwak; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2014-02-20

9.  Effects of D-cycloserine on cue-induced craving and cigarette smoking among concurrent cocaine- and nicotine-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Jin H Yoon; Thomas F Newton; Colin N Haile; Patrick S Bordnick; Rachel E Fintzy; Chris Culbertson; James J Mahoney; Rollin Y Hawkins; Kathleen R LaBounty; Elizabeth L Ross; Adel I Aziziyeh; Richard De La Garza
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  No effect of ambient odor on the affective appraisal of a desktop virtual environment with signs of disorder.

Authors:  Alexander Toet; Martin van Schaik; Nicolet C M Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.