Literature DB >> 19629699

Development of a novel intra-vaginal transducer with improved dynamic response.

Paul J Johnson1, Evan M Rosenbluth, Ingrid E Nygaard, Monir K Parikh, Robert W Hitchcock.   

Abstract

Limitations of standard clinical pressure transducers have hampered our ability to provide reliable measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during physical activities. To overcome these limitations, a novel intravaginal transducer (IVT) capable of accurate, reliable, and continuous IAP measurements during normal activity was developed. The design was validated through comparison with standard clinical pressure transducers in both bench top and clinical tests. The IVT demonstrated an improved dynamic response when compared to a standard rectal balloon catheter. Additionally, the radially symmetric design allows for accurate measurement within non-fluid-filled tissue cavities and simple placement within the vaginal canal. This is an advantage over sensor-tipped transducers which are only reliable in fluid-filled compartments. The IVT design presented here is preliminary to a wireless version that will allow for IAP measurement during activities outside the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629699      PMCID: PMC3774135          DOI: 10.1007/s10544-009-9339-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies.

Authors:  P J Culligan; R P Goldberg; D W Blackhurst; K Sasso; S Koduri; P K Sand
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Accuracy and dynamic response of disposable pressure transducer-tubing systems.

Authors:  P Hunziker
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  T J Iberti; K M Kelly; D R Gentili; S Hirsch; E Benjamin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Microtransducer urethral profile methodology: variations caused by transducer orientation.

Authors:  R S Anderson; A M Shepherd; R C Feneley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Rectal pressure measurements and intra-abdominal pressure changes.

Authors:  G A Barbalias
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluation.

Authors:  T A McCarthy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration.

Authors:  I L Kron; P K Harman; S P Nolan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Beat Roth; Fiona C Burkhard; Thomas M Kessler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Increases in intra-abdominal pressure affect pulmonary compliance.

Authors:  F Obeid; A Saba; J Fath; B Guslits; R Chung; V Sorensen; J Buck; M Horst
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Development of a wireless intra-vaginal transducer for monitoring intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Tanner J Coleman; Jens C Thomsen; Sean D Maass; Yvonne Hsu; Ingrid E Nygaard; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.838

2.  More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Clinical evaluation of a wireless intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Tanner J Coleman; Robert W Hitchcock; Kristina Heintz; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Effects of walking speeds and carrying techniques on intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Tanner J Coleman; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Huifeng Jin; Chan K Choi; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Authors:  Janet M Shaw; Nadia M Hamad; Tanner J Coleman; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Development and testing of a vaginal pressure sensor to measure intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Evan M Rosenbluth; Paul J Johnson; Robert W Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Clinical evaluation of a high-fidelity wireless intravaginal pressure sensor.

Authors:  Anuprita S Arora; Jennifer A Kruger; David M Budgett; Lynsey M Hayward; Jackie Smalldridge; Poul F Nielsen; Robert S Kirton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.