Literature DB >> 22618208

Clinical evaluation of a wireless intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Yvonne Hsu1, Tanner J Coleman, Robert W Hitchcock, Kristina Heintz, Janet M Shaw, Ingrid E Nygaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development, feasibility and validity of a wireless intra-vaginal pressure transducer (IVT) which can be used to measure intra-abdominal pressure in real-world settings. STUDY
DESIGN: A feasibility study was conducted in sixteen physically active women to determine retention and comfort of various IVT prototype designs during activity. A criterion validity study was conducted among women undergoing urodynamic testing to determine the accuracy of the IVT prototypes when compared to accepted clinical standards.
RESULTS: A final prototype wireless IVT was developed after four design revisions of the second generation model. The feasibility study found that women reported the final prototype comfortable to wear and easily retained during physical activity. Intra-abdominal pressure measurements from the final prototype IVT compared favorably to standard urodynamic transducers, thus confirming evidence of its utility.
CONCLUSION: We have successfully advanced the design of a wireless, intra-vaginal pressure transducer which provides accurate measures of intra-abdominal pressure. The final wireless IVT is better tolerated by patients and overcomes limitations of traditional urodynamic testing while laying the foundations for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring outside of the clinic environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22618208      PMCID: PMC3725759          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1811-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  19 in total

1.  Development of a wireless intra-vaginal transducer for monitoring intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Tanner J Coleman; Jens C Thomsen; Sean D Maass; Yvonne Hsu; Ingrid E Nygaard; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.838

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Michael E Albo; Mary P Fitzgerald; Susan M McDermott; Stephen Kraus; Holly E Richter; Philippe Zimmern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Safety and effectiveness of Colpexin Sphere in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  James Chivian Lukban; Oscar A Aguirre; G Willy Davila; Peter K Sand
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-11-19

5.  Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique.

Authors:  T J Iberti; C E Lieber; E Benjamin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  M D Barber; M N Kuchibhatla; C F Pieper; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Patrick J Woodman; Steven E Swift; Amy L O'Boyle; Michael T Valley; Deirdre R Bland; Margie A Kahn; Joseph I Schaffer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-11-01

8.  Randomized comparison of vaginal and rectal measurement of intra-abdominal pressure during subtracted dual-channel cystometry.

Authors:  Lucia M Dolan; W Elizabeth Dixon; Karen Brown; Tracy Ord; Paul Hilton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry?

Authors:  L L Wall; J K Hewitt; M J Helms
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  17 in total

1.  More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The Relationship Between Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Body Acceleration During Exercise.

Authors:  Johanna Day de Gennaro; Claire K de Gennaro; Janet M Shaw; Tomasz J Petelenz; Ingrid E Nygaard; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Development of a novel intra-abdominal pressure transducer for large scale clinical studies.

Authors:  Stefan Niederauer; Johanna de Gennaro; Ingrid Nygaard; Tomasz Petelenz; Robert Hitchcock
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 2.838

4.  Effects of walking speeds and carrying techniques on intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Tanner J Coleman; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Huifeng Jin; Chan K Choi; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Temporal trends in trunk flexor endurance and intra-abdominal pressure in postpartum women.

Authors:  Russell Hendrycks; Meng Yang; Robert Hitchcock; Monika Leitner; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Xiaoming Sheng; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer.

Authors:  Marlene J Egger; Nadia M Hamad; Robert W Hitchcock; Tanner J Coleman; Janet M Shaw; Yvonne Hsu; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Variables Affecting Intra-abdominal Pressure During Lifting in the Early Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Xiaoming Sheng
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Authors:  Janet M Shaw; Nadia M Hamad; Tanner J Coleman; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 9.  Activity restrictions after gynecologic surgery: is there evidence?

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Design and development of a novel intra-vaginal pressure sensor.

Authors:  Jennifer Kruger; Lynsey Hayward; Poul Nielsen; Denis Loiselle; Robert Kirton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.