Literature DB >> 19629383

A long journey from minimum inhibitory concentration testing to clinically predictive breakpoints: deterministic and probabilistic approaches in deriving breakpoints.

A Dalhoff1, P G Ambrose, J W Mouton.   

Abstract

Since the origin of an "'International Collaborative Study on Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing'" in 1971, considerable advancement has been made to standardize clinical susceptibility testing procedures of antimicrobial agents. However, a consensus on the methods to be used and interpretive criteria was not reached, so the results of susceptibility testing were discrepant. Recently, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing achieved a harmonization of existing methods for susceptibility testing and now co-ordinates the process for setting breakpoints. Previously, breakpoints were set by adjusting the mean pharmacokinetic parameters derived from healthy volunteers to the susceptibilities of a population of potential pathogens expressed as the mean minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or MIC90%. Breakpoints derived by the deterministic approach tend to be too high, since this procedure does not take the variabilities of drug exposure and the susceptibility patterns into account. Therefore, first-step mutants or borderline susceptible bacteria may be considered as fully susceptible. As the drug exposure of such sub-populations is inadequate, resistance development will increase and eradication rates will decrease, resulting in clinical failure. The science of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics integrates all possible drug exposures for standard dosage regimens and all MIC values likely to be found for the clinical isolates into the breakpoint definitions. Ideally, the data sets used originate from patients suffering from the disease to be treated. Probability density functions for both the pharmacokinetic and microbiological variables are determined, and a large number of MIC/drug exposure scenarios are calculated. Therefore, this method is defined as the probabilistic approach. The breakpoints thus derived are lower than the ones defined deterministically, as the entire range of probable drug exposures from low to high is modeled. Therefore, the amplification of drug-resistant sub-populations will be reduced. It has been a long journey since the first attempts in 1971 to define breakpoints. Clearly, this implies that none of the various approaches is right or wrong, and that the different approaches reflect different philosophies and mirror the tremendous progress made in the understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of different classes of antimicrobials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629383     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-009-7108-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  50 in total

1.  European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Technical Notes on antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  G Kahlmeter; D F J Brown; F W Goldstein; A P MacGowan; J W Mouton; I Odenholt; A Rodloff; C-J Soussy; M Steinbakk; F Soriano; O Stetsiouk
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): Relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  J J Schentag; D E Nix; M H Adelman
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-10

Review 3.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. I. The work of the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA and SRGA-M).

Authors:  B Olsson-Liljequist; A Forsgren
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1997

4.  Streptococcus pneumoniae in the USA: in vitro susceptibility and pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  E O Mason; L B Lamberth; N L Kershaw; B L Prosser; A Zoe; P G Ambrose
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: report from the ARREST program.

Authors:  P G Ambrose; S M Bhavnani; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  High rates of multiple antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae from healthy children living in isolated rural communities: association with cephalosporin use and intrafamilial transmission.

Authors:  M H Samore; M K Magill; S C Alder; E Severina; L Morrison-De Boer; J L Lyon; K Carroll; J Leary; M B Stone; D Bradford; J Reading; A Tomasz; M A Sande
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  In vitro activities of oral beta-lactams at concentrations achieved in humans against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci and potential to select resistance.

Authors:  C E Thorburn; S J Knott; D I Edwards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro selective antibiotic concentrations of beta-lactams for penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae populations.

Authors:  M C Negri; M I Morosini; E Loza; F Baquero
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  20 in total

1.  Proposal of a pharmacokinetically optimized dosage regimen of antibiotics in patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Takehito Yamamoto; Nobuhiro Yasuno; Shoichi Katada; Akihiro Hisaka; Norio Hanafusa; Eisei Noiri; Naoki Yahagi; Toshiro Fujita; Hiroshi Suzuki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the triazoles and six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document).

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; D J Diekema; A Fothergill; E Johnson; T Pelaez; M A Pfaller; M G Rinaldi; E Canton; J Turnidge
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multicenter study of isavuconazole MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex using the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; A Chowdhary; G M Gonzalez; J Guinea; F Hagen; J F Meis; G R Thompson; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multicenter evaluation of MIC distributions for epidemiologic cutoff value definition to detect amphotericin B, posaconazole, and itraconazole resistance among the most clinically relevant species of Mucorales.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; A Chakrabarti; A Chowdhary; S Cordoba; E Dannaoui; P Dufresne; A Fothergill; M Ghannoum; G M Gonzalez; J Guarro; S Kidd; C Lass-Flörl; J F Meis; T Pelaez; A M Tortorano; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and optimal dose and susceptibility breakpoint identification for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection.

Authors:  Devyani Deshpande; Shashikant Srivastava; Claudia Meek; Richard Leff; Gerri S Hall; Tawanda Gumbo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for amphotericin B and flucytosine.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; A Chowdhary; M Cuenca-Estrella; A Fothergill; J Fuller; F Hagen; N Govender; J Guarro; E Johnson; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; M A Martins; J F Meis; M S C Melhem; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; M A Pfaller; W A Schell; L Trilles; S Kidd; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Don't Get Wound Up: Revised Fluoroquinolone Breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Tam T Van; Emi Minejima; Chiao An Chiu; Susan M Butler-Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  New susceptibility breakpoints for first-line antituberculosis drugs based on antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic science and population pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Tawanda Gumbo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Multicenter study of isavuconazole MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; A Chowdhary; G M Gonzalez; C Lass-Flörl; E Martin-Mazuelos; J Meis; T Peláez; M A Pfaller; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Small molecule antivirulents targeting the iron-regulated heme oxygenase (HemO) of P. aeruginosa.

Authors:  Kellie Hom; Geoffrey A Heinzl; Suntara Eakanunkul; Pedro E M Lopes; Fengtian Xue; Alexander D MacKerell; Angela Wilks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.