Literature DB >> 19625060

Uropathogen interaction with the surface of urological stents using different surface properties.

Dirk Lange1, Chelsea N Elwood, Kenny Choi, Kari Hendlin, Manoj Monga, Ben H Chew.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ureteral stents commonly become infected or encrusted. Various coatings have been developed to decrease bacterial adherence. To our knowledge there has been no in vitro testing of coating with heparin to date. We determined the effects of heparin coating on bacterial adherence of common uropathogens and physical stent properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Heparin coated Radiance ureteral stents (Cook) and noncoated Endo-Sof control stents were tested against triclosan eluting Triumph(R) stents and noneluting Polaris control stents for adherence of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for 7 days. Adherent bacteria were determined and biofilms were visualized using fluorescent dyes. Radial, tensile and coil strength of the Radiance and Polaris stents was compared to determine the effect of heparin coating on physical stent characteristics.
RESULTS: Heparin coating did not decrease bacterial adhesion compared to its control. E. coli adhesion was limited by all stents tested. The Polaris stent showed significantly greater resistance to bacterial adherence for Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Enterococcus than the Endo-Sof and Radiance stents but was more susceptible to S. aureus adherence. The Triumph stent resisted all bacteria except Pseudomonas and Enterococcus. Mature biofilms were observed on all stents with lower viability on the Triumph stent. Radiance stents showed higher tensile and lower compression strength than its control.
CONCLUSIONS: Heparin coating does not decrease bacterial adherence to ureteral stents. Drug eluting antimicrobials have an inhibitory effect on bacterial adherence and the Polaris stent showed the least bacterial adherence of the nondrug eluting ureteral stents tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625060     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current status of ureteral stent technologies: comfort and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendez-Probst; Alfonso Fernandez; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Evaluation of a novel gel-based ureteral stent with biofilm-resistant characteristics.

Authors:  Brian M Rosman; Joao A B A Barbosa; Carlo P Passerotti; Marc Cendron; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Micropatterned surfaces for reducing the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an in vitro study on the effect of sharklet micropatterned surfaces to inhibit bacterial colonization and migration of uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Shravanthi T Reddy; Kenneth K Chung; Clinton J McDaniel; Rabih O Darouiche; Jaime Landman; Anthony B Brennan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Pantelis Kraniotis; Christos Rigopoulos; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Theodore Petsas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

5.  Update on ureteral stent technology.

Authors:  Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-08

6.  Comparison of the roll-plate and sonication techniques in the diagnosis of microbial ureteral stent colonisation: results of the first prospective randomised study.

Authors:  G Bonkat; O Braissant; M Rieken; G Müller; R Frei; Andre van der Merwe; F P Siegel; T C Gasser; S Wyler; A Bachmann; A F Widmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Update on biofilm infections in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Peter Tenke; Béla Köves; Károly Nagy; Scott J Hultgren; Werner Mendling; Björn Wullt; Magnus Grabe; Florian M E Wagenlehner; Mete Cek; Robert Pickard; Henry Botto; Kurt G Naber; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Heparin coating in biodegradable ureteral stents does not decrease bacterial colonization-assessment in ureteral stricture endourological treatment in animal model.

Authors:  Federico Soria; Julia E de La Cruz; Tomás Fernandez; Alberto Budia; Álvaro Serrano; Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

9.  Physical Properties of Electropolished CoCrMo Alloy Coated with Biodegradable Polymeric Coatings Releasing Heparin after Prolonged Exposure to Artificial Urine.

Authors:  Wojciech Kajzer; Janusz Szewczenko; Anita Kajzer; Marcin Basiaga; Joanna Jaworska; Katarzyna Jelonek; Katarzyna Nowińska; Marcin Kaczmarek; Ada Orłowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Ureteral Stents and Foley Catheters-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: The Role of Coatings and Materials in Infection Prevention.

Authors:  Joey Lo; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.