Literature DB >> 24366763

Evaluation of a novel gel-based ureteral stent with biofilm-resistant characteristics.

Brian M Rosman1, Joao A B A Barbosa, Carlo P Passerotti, Marc Cendron, Hiep T Nguyen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current ureteral stents, while effective at maintaining a ureteral lumen, provide a substrate for bacterial growth. This propensity for biofilm formation may be a nidus for bacterial growth leading to infection and a reason for early removal of a stent before it is clinically indicated. A newly devised stent, composed of a highly hydrated, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile polymer, is believed to have bacterial resistant properties. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biofilm growth and bacterial resistant properties of this novel stent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple 1 cm sections of the pAguaMedicina™ Pediatric Ureteral Stent (pAMS) (Q Urological, Natick, MA) and the conventional polymer stent (SS) (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) were incubated for 3 days in the 3 different growth media. Afterward, J96 human pathogenic Escherichia coli was added. At 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days following bacterial inoculation, the stent segments were washed, sonicated, and analyzed for bacterial growth. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed to assess biofilm formation.
RESULTS: pAMS demonstrated significant reductions (43-71 %) in bacterial counts when compared to standard stents in all conditions tested. SEM imaging demonstrated biofilm formation on both types of stents in all media, with a relative reduction in apparent cell debris and bacteria on the pAMS.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the gel-based stent shows a demonstrable reduction in bacterial counts and biofilm formation. The use of the pAMS may reduce the risk of infection associated with stent usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24366763     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0636-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  26 in total

Review 1.  Encrustation of biomaterials in the urinary tract.

Authors:  M Sofer; J D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Is it possible to prevent bacterial adhesion onto ureteric stents?

Authors:  L Cormio; P La Forgia; D La Forgia; A Siitonen; M Ruutu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1997

Review 3.  The role of biofilm infection in urology.

Authors:  P Tenke; B Kovacs; M Jäckel; E Nagy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration.

Authors:  A G Gristina
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Characterization of biofilm and encrustation on ureteric stents in vivo.

Authors:  P F Keane; M C Bonner; S R Johnston; A Zafar; S P Gorman
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-06

7.  Uropathogen interaction with the surface of urological stents using different surface properties.

Authors:  Dirk Lange; Chelsea N Elwood; Kenny Choi; Kari Hendlin; Manoj Monga; Ben H Chew
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparative assessment of ureteral stent biomaterial encrustation.

Authors:  M M Tunney; P F Keane; D S Jones; S P Gorman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Bacterial biofilms: influence on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J C Nickel; J W Costerton; R J McLean; M Olson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Risk factors for lower urinary tract infection and bacterial stent colonization in patients with a double J ureteral stent.

Authors:  Ali Ferruh Akay; Uğur Aflay; Abdullah Gedik; Hayrettin Sahin; Mehmet Kamuran Bircan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  4 in total

1.  Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Authors:  Kaiyang Yin; Prajan Divakar; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Impact of nanosystems in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms treatment.

Authors:  Rita M Pinto; Daniela Lopes-de-Campos; M Cristina L Martins; Patrick Van Dijck; Cláudia Nunes; Salette Reis
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Bacterial Colonization Incidence before and after Indwelling Double-J Ureteral Stents.

Authors:  Sholpan Kaliyeva; Natalya Simokhina; Alyona Lavrinenko; Gulzira Zhussupova; Serik Zhunusov; Polina Semenikhina; Yuliya Bikbatyrova; Berik Yelmagambetov; Zhanna Myasnikova
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 4.  Advances in ureteral stents.

Authors:  Hilary Brotherhood; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.