BACKGROUND:Microbial ureteral stent colonisation (MUSC) is one leading risk factor for complications associated with ureteral stent placement. As MUSC remains frequently undetected by standard urine cultures, its definitive diagnosis depends on microbiological investigation of the stent. However, a standard reference laboratory technique for studying MUSC is still lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 271 ureteral stents removed from 199 consecutive patients were investigated. Urine samples were obtained prior to device removal. Stents were divided into four parts. Each part was separately processed by the microbiology laboratory within 6 h. Ureteral stents were randomly allocated to roll-plate or sonication, respectively, and analysed using standard microbiological techniques. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected using a standard case-report form. RESULTS: Overall, roll-plate showed a higher detection rate of MUSC compared with sonication (35 vs. 28 %, p < 0.05) and urine culture (35 vs. 8 %, p < 0.05). No inferiority of Maki's technique was observed even when stents were stratified according to indwelling time below or above 30 days. Compared with roll-plate, sonication commonly failed to detect Enterococcus spp., coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterobacteriaceae. In addition, sonication required more hands-on time, more equipment and higher training than roll-plate in the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomised study demonstrates the superiority of Maki's roll-plate technique over sonication in the diagnosis of MUSC and that urine culture is less sensitive than both methods. The higher detection rate, simplicity and cost-effectiveness render roll-plate the methodology of choice for routine clinical investigation as well as basic laboratory research.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Microbial ureteral stent colonisation (MUSC) is one leading risk factor for complications associated with ureteral stent placement. As MUSC remains frequently undetected by standard urine cultures, its definitive diagnosis depends on microbiological investigation of the stent. However, a standard reference laboratory technique for studying MUSC is still lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 271 ureteral stents removed from 199 consecutive patients were investigated. Urine samples were obtained prior to device removal. Stents were divided into four parts. Each part was separately processed by the microbiology laboratory within 6 h. Ureteral stents were randomly allocated to roll-plate or sonication, respectively, and analysed using standard microbiological techniques. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected using a standard case-report form. RESULTS: Overall, roll-plate showed a higher detection rate of MUSC compared with sonication (35 vs. 28 %, p < 0.05) and urine culture (35 vs. 8 %, p < 0.05). No inferiority of Maki's technique was observed even when stents were stratified according to indwelling time below or above 30 days. Compared with roll-plate, sonication commonly failed to detect Enterococcus spp., coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterobacteriaceae. In addition, sonication required more hands-on time, more equipment and higher training than roll-plate in the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomised study demonstrates the superiority of Maki's roll-plate technique over sonication in the diagnosis of MUSC and that urine culture is less sensitive than both methods. The higher detection rate, simplicity and cost-effectiveness render roll-plate the methodology of choice for routine clinical investigation as well as basic laboratory research.
Authors: Carlos E Mendez-Probst; Lee W Goneau; Kyle W MacDonald; Linda Nott; Shannon Seney; Chelsea N Elwood; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew; John D Denstedt; Peter A Cadieux Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Alessandra Oliva; Maria Claudia Miele; Dania Al Ismail; Federica Di Timoteo; Massimiliano De Angelis; Luigi Rosa; Antimo Cutone; Mario Venditti; Maria Teresa Mascellino; Piera Valenti; Claudio Maria Mastroianni Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 5.640