Literature DB >> 19619222

Frequency-dependent success of cheaters during foraging bouts might limit their spread within colonies of a socially polymorphic spider.

Jonathan N Pruitt1, Susan E Riechert.   

Abstract

Although several studies have demonstrated that frequency-dependent effects can promote the maintenance of cooperative behavior in microbes, experimental evidence of frequency-dependent effects in cooperative animal societies is rare. We staged mixed phenotype feeding bouts in the spider Anelosimus studiosus, which shows a within-population social polymorphism, to determine how phenotype frequency affects the foraging success of the social (cooperative) and asocial (cheater) phenotypes. Foraging performance was inferred from average change in percent mass for the respective phenotypes after staged group foraging events. We then performed a field census of multifemale colonies of A. studiosus to determine the phenotypic composition of naturally occurring colonies. Our data indicate that asocial (i.e., cheater) individuals experience negative frequency-dependent foraging success in staged foraging contests. Asocial individuals outperform social individuals when their representation is low, but lose this competitive advantage as their relative numbers increase. Naturally occurring colonies, on average, contained 58.33% social and 41.67% asocial individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19619222     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00771.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Susan E Riechert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Relatedness predicts multiple measures of investment in cooperative nest construction in sociable weavers.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton; Sebastian Echeverri; Dirk Heinrich; Holger Kolberg
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Cheating and punishment in cooperative animal societies.

Authors:  Christina Riehl; Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Range expansion promotes cooperation in an experimental microbial metapopulation.

Authors:  Manoshi Sen Datta; Kirill S Korolev; Ivana Cvijovic; Carmel Dudley; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; C Tate Holbrook; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Producers and scroungers: feeding-type composition changes with group size in a socially foraging spider.

Authors:  Marlis Dumke; Marie E Herberstein; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Nutrient status shapes selfish mitochondrial genome dynamics across different levels of selection.

Authors:  Bryan L Gitschlag; Ann T Tate; Maulik R Patel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Population differences in aggression are shaped by tropical cyclone-induced selection.

Authors:  Alexander G Little; David N Fisher; Thomas W Schoener; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Social groups with diverse personalities mitigate physiological stress in a songbird.

Authors:  Csongor I Vágási; Attila Fülöp; Gergely Osváth; Péter L Pap; Janka Pénzes; Zoltán Benkő; Ádám Z Lendvai; Zoltán Barta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.