Literature DB >> 25274310

Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions.

Jonathan N Pruitt1, Charles J Goodnight2.   

Abstract

Group selection may be defined as selection caused by the differential extinction or proliferation of groups. The socially polymorphic spider Anelosimus studiosus exhibits a behavioural polymorphism in which females exhibit either a 'docile' or 'aggressive' behavioural phenotype. Natural colonies are composed of a mixture of related docile and aggressive individuals, and populations differ in colonies' characteristic docile:aggressive ratios. Using experimentally constructed colonies of known composition, here we demonstrate that population-level divergence in docile:aggressive ratios is driven by site-specific selection at the group level--certain ratios yield high survivorship at some sites but not others. Our data also indicate that colonies responded to the risk of extinction: perturbed colonies tended to adjust their composition over two generations to match the ratio characteristic of their native site, thus promoting their long-term survival in their natal habitat. However, colonies of displaced individuals continued to shift their compositions towards mixtures that would have promoted their survival had they remained at their home sites, regardless of their contemporary environment. Thus, the regulatory mechanisms that colonies use to adjust their composition appear to be locally adapted. Our data provide experimental evidence of group selection driving collective traits in wild populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274310     DOI: 10.1038/nature13811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  16 in total

1.  Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; William M Muir; Johan A M Van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology.

Authors:  David Sloan Wilson; Edward O Wilson
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  On multilevel selection and kin selection: contextual analysis meets direct fitness.

Authors:  Charles Goodnight
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Michael J Dlugos; John W Pepper; David Sloan Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses.

Authors:  W M Muir
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A real-time eco-evolutionary dead-end strategy is mediated by the traits of lineage progenitors and interactions with colony invaders.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Behavioural traits of colony founders affect the life history of their colonies.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.

Authors:  S A West; A S Griffin; A Gardner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies.

Authors:  Krista K Ingram; Anna Pilko; Jeffrey Heer; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Group selection and social evolution in domesticated animals.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Piter Bijma; Esther D Ellen; William Muir
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  35 in total

1.  Group selection versus group adaptation.

Authors:  Andy Gardner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Questioning evidence of group selection in spiders.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Trine Bilde; James D J Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pruitt & Goodnight reply.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The Achilles' heel hypothesis: misinformed keystone individuals impair collective learning and reduce group success.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Colin M Wright; Carl N Keiser; Alex E DeMarco; Matthew M Grobis; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Consequences of sex change for effective population size.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Stefano Mariani; Chiara Benvenuto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Agonistic reciprocity is associated with reduced male reproductive success within haremic social networks.

Authors:  Tessa K Solomon-Lane; Devaleena S Pradhan; Madelyne C Willis; Matthew S Grober
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolution: Evidence of group selection shown in social spiders.

Authors:  Bryony Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Habitat quality mediates personality through differences in social context.

Authors:  Benjamin A Belgrad; Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Evolutionary biology: Survival of the fittest group.

Authors:  Timothy Linksvayer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.