PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Every year, suicide claims the lives of tens of thousands of young people worldwide. Despite its high prevalence and known risk factors, suicidality is often undetected. Early identification of suicide risk may be an important method of mitigating this public health crisis. Screening youth for suicide may be a critical step in suicide prevention. This paper reviews suicide screening in three different settings: schools, primary care clinics and emergency departments (EDs). RECENT FINDINGS: Unrecognized and thus untreated suicidality leads to substantial morbidity and mortality. With the onus of detection falling on nonmental health professionals, brief screening tools can be used to initiate more in-depth evaluations. Nonetheless, there are serious complexities and implications of screening all children and adolescents for suicide. Recent studies show that managing positive screens is a monumental challenge, including the problem of false positives and the burden subsequently posed on systems of care. Furthermore, nearly 60% of youth in need of mental health services do not receive the care they need, even after suicide attempt. Schools, primary care clinics and EDs are logical settings where screening that leads to intervention can be initiated. SUMMARY: Valid, brief and easy-to-administer screening tools can be utilized to detect risk of suicide in children and adolescents. Targeted suicide screening in schools, and universal suicide screening in primary care clinics and EDs may be the most effective way to recognize and prevent self-harm. These settings must be equipped to manage youth who screen positive with effective and timely interventions. Most importantly, the impact of suicide screening in various settings needs to be further assessed.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Every year, suicide claims the lives of tens of thousands of young people worldwide. Despite its high prevalence and known risk factors, suicidality is often undetected. Early identification of suicide risk may be an important method of mitigating this public health crisis. Screening youth for suicide may be a critical step in suicide prevention. This paper reviews suicide screening in three different settings: schools, primary care clinics and emergency departments (EDs). RECENT FINDINGS: Unrecognized and thus untreated suicidality leads to substantial morbidity and mortality. With the onus of detection falling on nonmental health professionals, brief screening tools can be used to initiate more in-depth evaluations. Nonetheless, there are serious complexities and implications of screening all children and adolescents for suicide. Recent studies show that managing positive screens is a monumental challenge, including the problem of false positives and the burden subsequently posed on systems of care. Furthermore, nearly 60% of youth in need of mental health services do not receive the care they need, even after suicide attempt. Schools, primary care clinics and EDs are logical settings where screening that leads to intervention can be initiated. SUMMARY: Valid, brief and easy-to-administer screening tools can be utilized to detect risk of suicide in children and adolescents. Targeted suicide screening in schools, and universal suicide screening in primary care clinics and EDs may be the most effective way to recognize and prevent self-harm. These settings must be equipped to manage youth who screen positive with effective and timely interventions. Most importantly, the impact of suicide screening in various settings needs to be further assessed.
Authors: Jayne Cooper; Navneet Kapur; Roger Webb; Martin Lawlor; Else Guthrie; Kevin Mackway-Jones; Louis Appleby Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Michelle A Scott; Holly C Wilcox; Irvin Sam Schonfeld; Mark Davies; Roger C Hicks; J Blake Turner; David Shaffer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Denise Hallfors; Paul H Brodish; Shereen Khatapoush; Victoria Sanchez; Hyunsan Cho; Allan Steckler Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lisa M Vaughn; Cijy Elizabeth Sunny; Robin Lindquist-Grantz; Cheryl King; David Brent; Stephanie Boyd; Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan Journal: Arch Suicide Res Date: 2019-01-23
Authors: Pádraig Cotter; Michael Kaess; Paul Corcoran; Peter Parzer; Romuald Brunner; Helen Keeley; Vladimir Carli; Camilla Wasserman; Christina Hoven; Marco Sarchiapone; Alan Apter; Judit Balazs; Julio Bobes; Doina Cosman; Christian Haring; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Franz Resch; Vita Postuvan; Airi Värnik; Danuta Wasserman Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Austin J Gallyer; Carol Chu; Kelly M Klein; Jazmine Quintana; Corinne Carlton; Sean P Dougherty; Thomas E Joiner Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Marian E Betz; Matthew Miller; Catherine Barber; Ivan Miller; Ashley F Sullivan; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Marian E Betz; Ashley F Sullivan; Anne P Manton; Janice A Espinola; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 6.505