Lucy E Schoen1, Alyssa L Bogetz2, Melanie A Hom3, Rebecca A Bernert4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: schoenle@sutterhealth.org. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 3. Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Youth suicide is a public health emergency, and its prevention is a national imperative. Pediatric providers are critical to risk assessment, triage, and intervention, yet little is known about the content, quality, and perceived adequacy of suicide prevention pediatric residency training. We thus sought to (1) characterize suicide risk assessment and management training practices in pediatric residency programs nationwide and (2) assess areas of training need to guide curricular development. METHODS: An online nationwide needs assessment was distributed to all 204 pediatric residency program directors (PDs) and 494 pediatric chief residents (CRs) through the Association of Pediatric Program Directors listservs (May to June 2017). Descriptive statistics and comparisons between PDs and CRs are reported. RESULTS: Ninety-five PDs and 210 CRs (47% and 43% response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Although 82% of respondents rated suicide prevention training in residency as "very" or "extremely" important, a minority (18% PDs and 10% CRs) reported adequate preparation relative to need. Formal training was not universal (66% PDs and 45% CRs) and practices varied across programs (PD median = 3 hours [interquartile range: 1-4.5 hours], CR median = 1.5 hours [interquartile range: 0-3 hours]). Top-ranked educational priorities included interviewing adolescents about risk, risk factor identification, and locating community resources. Training barriers included limited time, lack of training resources, and need for additional expert faculty to guide training. CONCLUSIONS: PDs and CRs reported constraints to suicide prevention training for pediatric residents despite high perceived importance and need. Programs may benefit from explicit guidelines and standardized curricula that emphasize educational priorities, building on these findings.
PURPOSE: Youth suicide is a public health emergency, and its prevention is a national imperative. Pediatric providers are critical to risk assessment, triage, and intervention, yet little is known about the content, quality, and perceived adequacy of suicide prevention pediatric residency training. We thus sought to (1) characterize suicide risk assessment and management training practices in pediatric residency programs nationwide and (2) assess areas of training need to guide curricular development. METHODS: An online nationwide needs assessment was distributed to all 204 pediatric residency program directors (PDs) and 494 pediatric chief residents (CRs) through the Association of Pediatric Program Directors listservs (May to June 2017). Descriptive statistics and comparisons between PDs and CRs are reported. RESULTS: Ninety-five PDs and 210 CRs (47% and 43% response rate, respectively) completed the survey. Although 82% of respondents rated suicide prevention training in residency as "very" or "extremely" important, a minority (18% PDs and 10% CRs) reported adequate preparation relative to need. Formal training was not universal (66% PDs and 45% CRs) and practices varied across programs (PD median = 3 hours [interquartile range: 1-4.5 hours], CR median = 1.5 hours [interquartile range: 0-3 hours]). Top-ranked educational priorities included interviewing adolescents about risk, risk factor identification, and locating community resources. Training barriers included limited time, lack of training resources, and need for additional expert faculty to guide training. CONCLUSIONS:PDs and CRs reported constraints to suicide prevention training for pediatric residents despite high perceived importance and need. Programs may benefit from explicit guidelines and standardized curricula that emphasize educational priorities, building on these findings.
Authors: Peter Denchev; Jane L Pearson; Michael H Allen; Cynthia A Claassen; Glenn W Currier; Douglas F Zatzick; Michael Schoenbaum Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: David A Brent; Laurence L Greenhill; Scott Compton; Graham Emslie; Karen Wells; John T Walkup; Benedetto Vitiello; Oscar Bukstein; Barbara Stanley; Kelly Posner; Betsy D Kennard; Mary F Cwik; Ann Wagner; Barbara Coffey; John S March; Mark Riddle; Tina Goldstein; John Curry; Shannon Barnett; Lisa Capasso; Jamie Zelazny; Jennifer Hughes; Sa Shen; S Sonia Gugga; J Blake Turner Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Gil Zalsman; Keith Hawton; Danuta Wasserman; Kees van Heeringen; Ella Arensman; Marco Sarchiapone; Vladimir Carli; Cyril Höschl; Ran Barzilay; Judit Balazs; György Purebl; Jean Pierre Kahn; Pilar Alejandra Sáiz; Cendrine Bursztein Lipsicas; Julio Bobes; Doina Cozman; Ulrich Hegerl; Joseph Zohar Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 27.083