OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the degree of overlap between students identified through school-based suicide screening and those thought to be at risk by school administrative and clinical professionals. METHODS: Students from 7 high schools in the New York metropolitan area completed the Columbia Suicide Screen; 489 of the 1729 students screened had positive results. The clinical status of 641 students (73% of those who had screened positive and 23% of those who had screened negative) was assessed with modules from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. School professionals nominated by their principal and unaware of students' screening and diagnostic status were asked to indicate whether they were concerned about the emotional well-being of each participating student. RESULTS: Approximately 34% of students with significant mental health problems were identified only through screening, 13.0% were identified only by school professionals, 34.9% were identified both through screening and by school professionals, and 18.3% were identified neither through screening nor by school professionals. The corresponding percentages among students without mental health problems were 9.1%, 24.0%, 5.5%, and 61.3%. CONCLUSIONS: School-based screening can identify suicidal and emotionally troubled students not recognized by school professionals.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the degree of overlap between students identified through school-based suicide screening and those thought to be at risk by school administrative and clinical professionals. METHODS: Students from 7 high schools in the New York metropolitan area completed the Columbia Suicide Screen; 489 of the 1729 students screened had positive results. The clinical status of 641 students (73% of those who had screened positive and 23% of those who had screened negative) was assessed with modules from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. School professionals nominated by their principal and unaware of students' screening and diagnostic status were asked to indicate whether they were concerned about the emotional well-being of each participating student. RESULTS: Approximately 34% of students with significant mental health problems were identified only through screening, 13.0% were identified only by school professionals, 34.9% were identified both through screening and by school professionals, and 18.3% were identified neither through screening nor by school professionals. The corresponding percentages among students without mental health problems were 9.1%, 24.0%, 5.5%, and 61.3%. CONCLUSIONS: School-based screening can identify suicidal and emotionally troubled students not recognized by school professionals.
Authors: Jessica Clark Newman; Don C Des Jarlais; Charles F Turner; Jay Gribble; Phillip Cooley; Denise Paone Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M E Schwab-Stone; D Shaffer; M K Dulcan; P S Jensen; P Fisher; H R Bird; S H Goodman; B B Lahey; J H Lichtman; G Canino; M Rubio-Stipec; D S Rae Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: D Shaffer; P Fisher; M K Dulcan; M Davies; J Piacentini; M E Schwab-Stone; B B Lahey; K Bourdon; P S Jensen; H R Bird; G Canino; D A Regier Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: D A Brent; B Johnson; S Bartle; J Bridge; C Rather; J Matta; J Connolly; D Constantine Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: David Shaffer; Michelle Scott; Holly Wilcox; Carey Maslow; Roger Hicks; Christopher P Lucas; Robin Garfinkel; Steven Greenwald Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Michael Kaess; Romuald Brunner; Peter Parzer; Vladimir Carli; Alan Apter; Judit A Balazs; Julio Bobes; Horia G Coman; Doina Cosman; Padraig Cotter; Tony Durkee; Luca Farkas; Dana Feldman; Christian Haring; Miriam Iosue; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Helen Keeley; Tina Podlogar; Vita Postuvan; Franz Resch; Pilar A Sáiz; Merike Sisask; Alexandra Tubiana; Peeter Värnik; Marco Sarchiapone; Christina W Hoven; Danuta Wasserman Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Daniela Colognori; Petra Esseling; Catherine Stewart; Philip Reiss; Feihan Lu; Brady Case; Carrie Masia Warner Journal: School Ment Health Date: 2012-12-01
Authors: Davene R Wright; S Bryn Austin; H LeAnn Noh; Yushan Jiang; Kendrin R Sonneville Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mark A Ferro; Anne E Rhodes; Melissa Kimber; Laura Duncan; Michael H Boyle; Katholiki Georgiades; Andrea Gonzalez; Harriet L MacMillan Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Elizabeth D Ballard; Abigail Bosk; Deborah Snyder; Maryland Pao; Jeffrey A Bridge; Elizabeth A Wharff; Stephen J Teach; Lisa Horowitz Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Madelyn S Gould; Frank A Marrocco; Kimberly Hoagwood; Marjorie Kleinman; Lia Amakawa; Elizabeth Altschuler Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 8.829