Literature DB >> 19617452

Are in vitro tests suitable for regulatory use?

Thomas Hartung1, George Daston.   

Abstract

"All models are wrong, some models are useful." George E.P. Box, "Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building", 1979. This quote from George Box was the title of a book chapter on mathematical models-exactly the type of models which we will not address here, although a lot of the general reasoning can as well be translated to them, especially because they depend on the input and thus on the limitations of either in vitro or in vivo data, when applied for regulatory toxicology. This article was prompted by the 2008 SOT/EuroTox debate (March 2008 in Seattle and October 2008 in Rhodes), which challenged us in an Hegelian approach as thesis and antithesis to present with changing roles on both occasions on the statement "In vitro tests are useless for regulatory use." Here, we would like following Hegel a summary of thesis and antithesis, but also try to outline the synthesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617452     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  37 in total

Review 1.  The importance of a validated standard methodology to define in vitro toxicity of nano-TiO2.

Authors:  Janez Valant; Ivo Iavicoli; Damjana Drobne
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  High-content assays for hepatotoxicity using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cells.

Authors:  Oksana Sirenko; Jayne Hesley; Ivan Rusyn; Evan F Cromwell
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 1.738

3.  The stentable in vitro artery: an instrumented platform for endovascular device development and optimization.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Antoine; François P Cornat; Abdul I Barakat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Methods for evaluating variability in human health dose-response characterization.

Authors:  Daniel A Axelrad; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas F Bateson; Michael DeVito; Rebecca C Dzubow; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Alicia M Frame; Karen A Hogan; Keith Houck; Michael Stewart
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Biological reactivity of TiO2 nanoparticles assessed by ex vivo testing.

Authors:  Janez Valant; Damjana Drobne
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 3.356

6.  Improved in vitro assay for determining the mucin adherence of bacteria sensitive to Triton X-100 treatment.

Authors:  Varvara Tsilia; Pieter Van den Abbeele; Tom Van de Wiele
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  In vitro bioassays to evaluate complex chemical mixtures in recycled water.

Authors:  Ai Jia; Beate I Escher; Frederic D L Leusch; Janet Y M Tang; Erik Prochazka; Bingfeng Dong; Erin M Snyder; Shane A Snyder
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Hemacytotoxicity and natural killer lytic index: New parameters to evaluate natural killer cell immunity for clinical use in cancer.

Authors:  Hyung Gun Maeng; Su Jin Lee; Yun A Lee; Hye Jeong Lee; Young Joo Kim; Jong Kyun Lee; Jae Cheol Kim; Joungbum Choi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  A Workflow for Identifying Metabolically Active Chemicals to Complement in vitro Toxicity Screening.

Authors:  Jeremy A Leonard; Caroline Stevens; Kamel Mansouri; Daniel Chang; Harish Pudukodu; Sherrie Smith; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2018-05

10.  Silver impairs neurodevelopment: studies in PC12 cells.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Nicola Wrench; Ian T Ryde; Amanda M Smith; Frederic J Seidler; Theodore A Slotkin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.