Literature DB >> 31404325

Methods for evaluating variability in human health dose-response characterization.

Daniel A Axelrad1, R Woodrow Setzer2, Thomas F Bateson3, Michael DeVito4, Rebecca C Dzubow5, Julie W Fitzpatrick6, Alicia M Frame7, Karen A Hogan3, Keith Houck2, Michael Stewart2.   

Abstract

The Reference Dose (RfD) and Reference Concentration (RfC) are human health reference values (RfVs) representing exposure concentrations at or below which there is presumed to be little risk of adverse effects in the general human population. The 2009 National Research Council report Science and Decisions recommended redefining RfVs as "a risk-specific dose (for example, the dose associated with a 1 in 100,000 risk of a particular end point)." Distributions representing variability in human response to environmental contaminant exposures are critical for deriving risk-specific doses. Existing distributions estimating the extent of human toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic variability are based largely on controlled human exposure studies of pharmaceuticals. New data and methods have been developed that are designed to improve estimation of the quantitative variability in human response to environmental chemical exposures. Categories of research with potential to provide new database useful for developing updated human variability distributions include controlled human experiments, human epidemiology, animal models of genetic variability, in vitro estimates of toxicodynamic variability, and in vitro-based models of toxicokinetic variability. In vitro approaches, with further development including studies of different cell types and endpoints, and approaches to incorporate non-genetic sources of variability, appear to provide the greatest opportunity for substantial near-term advances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human variability; dose-response; in vitro; probabilistic risk; reference value; risk assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31404325      PMCID: PMC6688638          DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2019.1615828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess        ISSN: 1080-7039            Impact factor:   5.190


  74 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics.

Authors:  W E Evans; M V Relling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Embryotoxicity screening using embryonic stem cells in vitro: correlation to in vivo teratogenicity.

Authors:  G Scholz; I Pohl; E Genschow; M Klemm; H Spielmann
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.481

3.  Selection bias in the assessment of gene-environment interaction in case-control studies.

Authors:  Libby M Morimoto; Emily White; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Tutorial in Biostatistics: Evaluating the impact of 'critical periods' in longitudinal studies of growth using piecewise mixed effects models.

Authors:  E N Naumova; A Must; N M Laird
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Reproductive and developmental risks from ethylene oxide: a probabilistic characterization of possible regulatory thresholds.

Authors:  J S Evans; L R Rhomberg; P L Williams; A M Wilson; S J Baird
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  A straw man proposal for a quantitative definition of the RfD.

Authors:  Dale Hattis; Sandra Baird; Robert Goble
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.356

7.  Who is sensitive to the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality? A case-crossover analysis of effect modifiers.

Authors:  Thomas F Bateson; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Exposure variability: concepts and applications in occupational epidemiology.

Authors:  Dana Loomis; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  The impact of cytochrome P450 2E1-dependent metabolic variance on a risk-relevant pharmacokinetic outcome in humans.

Authors:  John C Lipscomb; Linda K Teuschler; Jeff Swartout; Doug Popken; Tony Cox; Gregory L Kedderis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Human colon microbiota transform polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to estrogenic metabolites.

Authors:  Tom Van de Wiele; Lynn Vanhaecke; Charlotte Boeckaert; Kerry Peru; John Headley; Willy Verstraete; Steven Siciliano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Health risk assessment of nitrate in groundwater resources of Iranshahr using Monte Carlo simulation and geographic information system (GIS).

Authors:  Naseh Shalyari; Abdolazim Alinejad; Amir Hossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi; Majid RadFard; Mansooreh Dehghani
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2019-07-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.