Literature DB >> 25989591

In vitro bioassays to evaluate complex chemical mixtures in recycled water.

Ai Jia1, Beate I Escher2, Frederic D L Leusch3, Janet Y M Tang4, Erik Prochazka3, Bingfeng Dong1, Erin M Snyder1, Shane A Snyder5.   

Abstract

With burgeoning population and diminishing availability of freshwater resources, the world continues to expand the use of alternative water resources for drinking, and the quality of these sources has been a great concern for the public as well as public health professionals. In vitro bioassays are increasingly being used to enable rapid, relatively inexpensive toxicity screening that can be used in conjunction with analytical chemistry data to evaluate water quality and the effectiveness of water treatment. In this study, a comprehensive bioassay battery consisting of 36 bioassays covering 18 biological endpoints was applied to screen the bioactivity of waters of varying qualities with parallel treatments. Samples include wastewater effluent, ultraviolet light (UV) and/or ozone advanced oxidation processed (AOP) recycled water, and infiltrated recycled groundwater. Based on assay sensitivity and detection frequency in the samples, several endpoints were highlighted in the battery, including assays for genotoxicity, mutagenicity, estrogenic activity, glucocorticoid activity, arylhydrocarbon receptor activity, oxidative stress response, and cytotoxicity. Attenuation of bioactivity was found to be dependent on the treatment process and bioassay endpoint. For instance, ozone technology significantly removed oxidative stress activity, while UV based technologies were most efficient for the attenuation of glucocorticoid activity. Chlorination partially attenuated genotoxicity and greatly decreased herbicidal activity, while groundwater infiltration efficiently attenuated most of the evaluated bioactivity with the exception of genotoxicity. In some cases, bioactivity (e.g., mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and arylhydrocarbon receptor) increased following water treatment, indicating that transformation products of water treatment may be a concern. Furthermore, several types of bioassays with the same endpoint were compared in this study, which could help guide the selection of optimized methods in future studies. Overall, this research indicates that a battery of bioassays can be used to support decision-making on the application of advanced water treatment processes for removal of bioactivity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced oxidation process; Bioassay; In vitro; Recycled water; Toxicity; Water treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989591      PMCID: PMC4776319          DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  61 in total

1.  Detection of paralytic shellfish poison by rapid cell bioassay: antagonism of voltage-gated sodium channel active toxins in vitro.

Authors:  Ronald L Manger; Linda S Leja; Sue Y Lee; James M Hungerford; Mary Ann Kirkpatrick; Takeshi Yasumoto; Marleen M Wekell
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.913

2.  International round-robin study on the Ames fluctuation test.

Authors:  G Reifferscheid; H M Maes; B Allner; J Badurova; S Belkin; K Bluhm; F Brauer; J Bressling; S Domeneghetti; T Elad; S Flückiger-Isler; H J Grummt; R Gürtler; A Hecht; M B Heringa; H Hollert; S Huber; M Kramer; A Magdeburg; H T Ratte; R Sauerborn-Klobucar; A Sokolowski; P Soldan; T Smital; D Stalter; P Venier; Chr Ziemann; J Zipperle; S Buchinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Changes in estrogen/anti-estrogen activities in ponded secondary effluent.

Authors:  Otakuye Conroy; A Eduardo Sáez; David Quanrud; Wendell Ela; Robert G Arnold
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Are in vitro tests suitable for regulatory use?

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; George Daston
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Halopyrroles: a new group of highly toxic disinfection byproducts formed in chlorinated saline wastewater.

Authors:  Mengting Yang; Xiangru Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Development of a stably transfected estrogen receptor-mediated luciferase reporter gene assay in the human T47D breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  J Legler; C E van den Brink; A Brouwer; A J Murk; P T van der Saag; A D Vethaak; B van der Burg
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Development of a green fluorescent protein-based cell bioassay for the rapid and inexpensive detection and characterization of ah receptor agonists.

Authors:  Scott R Nagy; James R Sanborn; Bruce D Hammock; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  In vitro potential genotoxic effects of surface drinking water treated with chlorine and alternative disinfectants.

Authors:  Licia Guzzella; Silvano Monarca; Claudia Zani; Donatella Feretti; Ilaria Zerbini; Annamaria Buschini; Paola Poli; Carlo Rossi; Susan D Richardson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  An assessment of in vitro androgenic activity and the identification of environmental androgens in United Kingdom estuaries.

Authors:  Kevin V Thomas; Mark R Hurst; Peter Matthiessen; Mathew McHugh; Andy Smith; Michael J Waldock
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  13 in total

1.  Generalized Concentration Addition Model Predicts Glucocorticoid Activity Bioassay Responses to Environmentally Detected Receptor-Ligand Mixtures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Risk Characterization of Environmental Samples Using In Vitro Bioactivity and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations Data.

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Dillon Lloyd; Yi-Hui Zhou; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  A Reduced Transcriptome Approach to Assess Environmental Toxicants Using Zebrafish Embryo Test.

Authors:  Pingping Wang; Pu Xia; Jianghua Yang; Zhihao Wang; Ying Peng; Wei Shi; Daniel L Villeneuve; Hongxia Yu; Xiaowei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of genotoxins using SRRz lysis reporter under the control of a newly designed SOS responsive promoter in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Pengfei Yuan; Junqing Dong; Weibin Zhao; Min Zhuo; Shuang Li; Shaobin Huang; Jianjun Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  In vitro effects-based method and water quality screening model for use in pre- and post-distribution treated waters.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; Nicola Evans; Luke R Iwanowicz; Joshua M Allen; Elizabeth Wagner; Katherine Bokenkamp; Susan D Richardson; Michael J Plewa; Paul M Bradley; Kristin M Romanok; Dana W Kolpin; Justin M Conley; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  De Facto Water Reuse: Bioassay suite approach delivers depth and breadth in endocrine active compound detection.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Medlock Kakaley; Brett R Blackwell; Mary C Cardon; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; David J Feifarek; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Dana W Kolpin; Marc A Mills; Laura Rosenblum; Daniel L Villeneuve; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 10.753

8.  Mapping multiple endocrine disrupting activities in Virginia rivers using effect-based assays.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; Michael Collins; Andrew McGowan; Lyuba Varticovski; Razi Raziuddin; David Owen Brody; Jerry Zhao; Johnna Lee; Riley Kuehn; Elisabeth Dehareng; Nicholas Mazza; Gianluca Pegoraro; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 10.753

9.  Toxic anthropogenic signature in Antarctic continental shelf and deep sea sediments.

Authors:  Enrique Isla; Elisabet Pérez-Albaladejo; Cinta Porte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Occurrence and removal of phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in the water treatment processes.

Authors:  Xuemin Lv; Sanhua Xiao; Gang Zhang; Pu Jiang; Fei Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.