Literature DB >> 19616260

Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy.

Joseph A Pettus1, Timothy Masterson, Alexander Sokol, Angel M Cronin, Caroline Savage, Jaspreet S Sandhu, John P Mulhall, Peter T Scardino, Farhang Rabbani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of prostate size on operative difficulty as measured by estimated blood loss, operating room time and positive surgical margins. In addition, we assessed the impact on biochemical recurrence and the functional outcomes of potency and continence at 1 year after radical prostatectomy as well as postoperative bladder neck contracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2007, 3,067 men underwent radical prostatectomy by 1 of 5 dedicated prostate surgeons with no neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Pathological specimen weight was used as a measure of prostate size. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression analysis was used to study the association between specimen weight, and biochemical recurrence and surgical margin status, respectively, controlling for adverse pathological features. Continence and potency were analyzed controlling for age, nerve sparing status and surgical approach.
RESULTS: With increasing prostate size there was increased estimated blood loss (p = 0.013) and operative time (p = 0.004), and a decrease in positive surgical margins (84 of 632 [14%] for 40 gm or less, 99 of 862 [12%] for 41 to 50 gm, 78 of 842 [10%] for 51 to 65 gm, 68 of 731 [10%] for more than 65 gm, p <0.001). Biochemical recurrence was observed in 186 of 2,882 patients followed postoperatively and was not significantly associated with specimen weight (p = 0.3). Complete continence was observed in 1,165 of 1,422 patients (82%) and potency in 425 of 827 (51%) at 1 year. Specimen weight was not significantly associated with potency (p = 0.8), continence (p = 0.08) or bladder neck contracture (p = 0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate size does not appear to affect biochemical recurrence or 1-year functional results. However, estimated blood loss and operative time increased with larger prostate size, and positive surgical margins are more often observed in smaller glands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19616260      PMCID: PMC2885288          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Elias I Hsu; Eugene K Hong; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Elyn R Riedel; Colin B Begg; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C M Chang; D Moon; T R Gianduzzo; C G Eden
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Pretreatment total testosterone level predicts pathological stage in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jason C Massengill; Leon Sun; Judd W Moul; Hongyu Wu; David G McLeod; Christopher Amling; Raymond Lance; John Foley; Wade Sexton; Leo Kusuda; Andrew Chung; Douglas Soderdahl; Timothy Donahue
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J A Eastham; M W Kattan; E Rogers; J R Goad; M Ohori; T B Boone; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; WilliamJ Aronson; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; Martha K Terris; David Elashoff; Christopher L Amling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates.

Authors:  C L Foley; S R J Bott; K Thomas; M C Parkinson; R S Kirby
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  The impact of prostate size on perioperative outcomes in a large laparoscopic radical prostatectomy series.

Authors:  Adam W Levinson; Nicholas T Ward; Aaron Sulman; Lynda Z Mettee; Richard E Link; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian A Link; Rebecca Nelson; David Y Josephson; Jeffrey S Yoshida; Laura E Crocitto; Mark H Kawachi; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian von Bodman; Kazuhito Matsushita; Caroline Savage; Mika P Matikainen; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Farhang Rabbani; Oguz Akin; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size?

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Ryan C Hedgepeth; Yun Zhang; Alon Z Weizer; Jeffrey S Montgomery; David C Miller; David P Wood; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Regarding: 'High-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary prostate cancer: the first UK series'.

Authors:  S Eggener; M Gonzalgo; O Yossepowitch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Uğur Boylu; Turgay Turan; Cem Başataç; Fikret Fatih Önol; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12

8.  Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: Population-based averages within PSA and Gleason strata.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Marco A Salazar; Suman Chatterjee; Daniel W Lin; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens.

Authors:  Heng Hong; Lin Mel; Jonathan Taylor; Qiang Wu; Hugh Reeves
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Does size matter? The significance of prostate size on pathologic and functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Carl A Olsson; Hugh J Lavery; Dov Sebrow; Ardavan Akhavan; Adam W Levinson; Jonathan S Brajtbord; John Carlucci; Paul Muntner; David B Samadi
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.