Literature DB >> 12771736

Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database.

Stephen J Freedland1, WilliamJ Aronson, Joseph C Presti, Christopher J Kane, Martha K Terris, David Elashoff, Christopher L Amling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The finding of a positive surgical margin associated with extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy is a poor prognostic factor. However, whether a positive surgical margin with no documented extracapsular extension portends a similarly poor prognosis is unclear. We examined the significance of the pathological features of positive surgical margin and extracapsular extension for predicting biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined data on 1,621 men from the SEARCH Database of patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node metastasis. Patients were separated into 5 groups based on the pathological findings of positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension, and/or seminal vesicle invasion. Preoperative clinical variables were compared across the groups and the groups were compared for time to biochemical recurrence using Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: Men with seminal vesicle invasion had the highest prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence rates, while men with a negative surgical margin and no extracapsular extension had the lowest PSA recurrence rates. There were no differences in PSA failure rates between men with a positive surgical margin and no extracapsular extension versus men with a negative surgical margin and extracapsular extension versus men with extracapsular extension and a positive surgical margin. In this subset of patients with a positive surgical margin and/or extracapsular extension but no seminal vesicle invasion only serum PSA was a significant independent predictor of biochemical recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Men with a positive surgical margin but no extracapsular extension had PSA recurrence rates similar to those in men with extracapsular extension with or without positive margins. Men with extracapsular extension had similar biochemical recurrence rates whether the surgical margin was positive or negative. If confirmed at other institutions, consideration should be given to modifying the current TNM staging system to reflect these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771736     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000061760.23169.be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Ki67 staining index and neuroendocrine differentiation aggravate adverse prognostic parameters in prostate cancer and are characterized by negligible inter-observer variability.

Authors:  Sven Gunia; Knut Albrecht; Stefan Koch; Thomas Herrmann; Thorsten Ecke; Volker Loy; Jörg Linke; Michael Siegsmund; Matthias May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group.

Authors:  Anna E Teeter; Lionel L Bañez; Joseph C Presti; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Sarah J Drouin; Julie Rode; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Limitations of prostate specific antigen doubling time following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Robert J Hamilton; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Obesity and positive surgical margins by anatomic location after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Jayachandran; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Joseph A Pettus; Timothy Masterson; Alexander Sokol; Angel M Cronin; Caroline Savage; Jaspreet S Sandhu; John P Mulhall; Peter T Scardino; Farhang Rabbani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Impact of nerve sparing on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  J L Nelles; S J Freedland; J C Presti; M K Terris; W J Aronson; C L Amling; C J Kane
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic positive margins: incidence, site, factors involved, and time to PSA progression following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Isabela C Watanabe; Matheus V Costa; Gilliat H Telles; Luis A Magna
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Biochemical recurrence of pathological T2+ localized prostate cancer after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A 10-year surveillance.

Authors:  Che Hseuh Yang; Yi Sheng Lin; Yen Chuan Ou; Wei Chun Weng; Li Hua Huang; Chin Heng Lu; Chao Yu Hsu; Min Che Tung
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

10.  Indications for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer after surgery with positive surgical margins.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kamecki; Marta Biedka; Roman Makarewicz; Jerzy Siekiera
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.