Literature DB >> 19125654

The impact of prostate size on perioperative outcomes in a large laparoscopic radical prostatectomy series.

Adam W Levinson1, Nicholas T Ward, Aaron Sulman, Lynda Z Mettee, Richard E Link, Li-Ming Su, Christian P Pavlovich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the effects of pathologic prostate specimen weight on perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), a subject that has recently been analyzed in numerous smaller series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from our Institution Review Board-approved database was queried with attention to operative, perioperative, and pathologic outcomes. For analysis, LRP patients were divided into three groups by pathologic specimen weight: <35 g, 35 to 70 g, and >70 g, and outcomes assessed. Outcomes were also analyzed using prostate weight as a continuous variable by multivariate regression.
RESULTS: Between April 2001 and April 2007, 802 consecutive patients underwent LRP for localized prostate cancer, and complete perioperative data were available for 720 (90%) of these men. Mean age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and postoperative Gleason score were 57.6 years, 26.7 kg/m(2), 5.9 ng/mL, and 6.3, respectively. Mean specimen weight was 51.3 g. When compared with lighter counterparts, patients with the heaviest glands were older (P < 0.01), had a higher PSA level (P < 0.01), and had a higher percentage of pathologically organ-confined disease (P < 0.01). By multivariate regression analysis, increasing prostate weight was associated with longer operative times, more blood loss, longer lengths of stay, and more perioperative complications (all P < 0.05). Of note, smaller glands trended toward a higher rate of positive surgical margins overall (P = 0.07) and in pT(2) disease (P = 0.05), but there was no association between surgical margins and gland size in pT(3) disease (P = 0.27). Increasing BMI was also independently predictive of positive margins regardless of prostate size (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Although perioperative outcomes are generally excellent after LRP irrespective of gland size, a larger prostate size is associated with longer operative time, more blood loss, longer length of stay, and increased complications. Patients with smaller glands and organ-confined disease appear to have a higher rate of positive surgical margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125654     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Prostate cancer at the peripheral end of prostate biopsy specimen predicts increased risk of positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Sophina Trubel; Paul Schramek; Florian Wimpissinger; Hans Feichtinger; Christopher Springer; Clemens Wehrberger; Katja Fischereder; Karl Pummer; Thomas Martini; Roman Mayr; Armin Pycha; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Joseph A Pettus; Timothy Masterson; Alexander Sokol; Angel M Cronin; Caroline Savage; Jaspreet S Sandhu; John P Mulhall; Peter T Scardino; Farhang Rabbani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.

Authors:  Eliney Ferreira Faria; Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel; André Berger; Anuar Mitre; Breno Dauster; Celso Heitor Freitas; Clovis Fraga; Daher Chade; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Francisco Carvalho; Franz Campos; Gustavo Franco Carvalhal; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Gustavo Guimarães; Hamilton Zampolli; Joao Ricardo Alves; Joao Pádua Manzano; Marco Antônio Fortes; Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha; Mauricio Rubinstein; Murilo Luz; Pedro Romanelli; Rafael Coelho; Raphael Rocha; Roberto Dias Machado; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Stenio Zequi; Romulo Guida; Valdair Muglia; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 5.  Impact of Prostate Size on the Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omar Fahmy; Nabil A Alhakamy; Osama A A Ahmed; Mohd Ghani Khairul-Asri
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Does size matter? The significance of prostate size on pathologic and functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Carl A Olsson; Hugh J Lavery; Dov Sebrow; Ardavan Akhavan; Adam W Levinson; Jonathan S Brajtbord; John Carlucci; Paul Muntner; David B Samadi
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-11-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.