Literature DB >> 26328112

The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Uğur Boylu1, Turgay Turan1, Cem Başataç1, Fikret Fatih Önol1, Eyüp Gümüş1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effect of prostate volume on the surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was evaluated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 180 patients who underwent RARP and had at least a 1-year follow-up were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on prostate weight (Group 1: <45 g, Group 2: 45-75 g, and Group 3: >76 g). Erectile function and continence were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) score and daily pad usage were evaluated as indicators of erectile function and continence, respectively. The measurement of two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values over 0.2 ng/mL was considered biochemical disease recurrence.
RESULTS: Patients with larger prostates were older and had a longer operative time and higher PSA level compared with patients with smaller prostates (p<0.05). The positive surgical margin rate was higher in patients with smaller prostates (p=0.06). However, patients with a prostate weight <45 g had higher IIEF scores at 3 and 6 months. IIEF scores were similar at the end of the 1-year follow-up period. Pad usage and time to continence were higher in patients with larger prostates (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Although prostate weight affected the surgical outcomes of RARP, the functional and oncological outcomes were similar among all patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine their impact on oncological outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; Prostate weight; robot

Year:  2013        PMID: 26328112      PMCID: PMC4548603          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2013.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  16 in total

1.  Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Pablo E Marchetti; Sergey Shikanov; Aria A Razmaria; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C M Chang; D Moon; T R Gianduzzo; C G Eden
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading.

Authors:  Boris Gershman; Douglas M Dahl; Aria F Olumi; Robert H Young; W Scott McDougal; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume--analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Natalia Sadetsky; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Francesco Montorsi; Timothy G Wilson; Raymond C Rosen; Thomas E Ahlering; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; James A Eastham; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giorgio Guazzoni; Mani Menon; Giacomo Novara; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Hein Van Poppel; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Judd Boczko; Erdal Erturk; Dragan Golijanin; Ralph Madeb; Hitendra Patel; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Randy Fagin; Gaurang Shah; Bijan Shekarriz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight ≥100 grams versus ≤50 grams: surgical, oncologic and short-term functional outcomes.

Authors:  Apostolos P Labanaris; Vahudin Zugor; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian A Link; Rebecca Nelson; David Y Josephson; Jeffrey S Yoshida; Laura E Crocitto; Mark H Kawachi; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Impact of prostate size on pathologic outcomes and prognosis after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sun Ho Min; Yong Hyun Park; Seung Bae Lee; Ja Hyeon Ku; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.