Literature DB >> 11893132

Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management.

S Michael Griffin1, Ian H Shaw, Samuel M Dresner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal resection represents a major surgical and physiologic insult carrying major morbidity and mortality. We present the results of esophagectomy in a specialist unit with emphasis on early complications and their management. STUDY
DESIGN: From January 4, 1990 through January 6, 2000, 228 patients have undergone Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for malignancy under the care of one surgeon. The median age was 64 years (range 39 to 77 years), with a male to female ratio of 2.3:1 and a predominance of adenocarcinoma (n = 146) compared with squamous cell carcinoma (n = 75) and other tumors (n = 7). Detailed prospective data were collected on preoperative status, operative parameters, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Median ICU stay was 1 day (range 1 to 47 days) and the median postoperative hospital stay in patients surviving surgery (n= 219) was 13 days (range 9 to 159 days). There were 119 separate postoperative complications occurring in 45% of patients (102 of 228), comprising predominantly pulmonary morbidity. Major respiratory complications (17%) were significantly associated with poor preoperative spirometry (p = 0.002) and a history of smoking (p = 0.03). Seven percent of patients (16 of 228) suffered cardiovascular or thromboembolic complications. Major surgical complications occurred in 10% of patients (22 of 228) including mediastinal leaks in 4%. Isolated anastomotic leaks (2%) were successfully treated conservatively in all cases; extensive leaks from ischemic gastric conduits (1%) or gastrotomy dehiscence (1%) underwent further exploration and either local repair or resection and exclusion. Reoperation for hemostasis was required in 3% (6 of 228) and only 1% of patients (2 of 228) developed chyle leaks. Thirty-day mortality was 2%, rising to 4% for in-hospital mortality. The nine fatalities were significantly older (p = 0.02) than those who survived and 67% (6 of 9) had suffered primary surgical complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall morbidity after radical esophagectomy is high, but early recognition and aggressive management of complications can minimize subsequent mortality. Concentration of facilities and surgical expertise in specialist units together with more careful patient selection can decrease mortality further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11893132     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01177-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  49 in total

1.  An analysis of esophageal cancer incidence in Cixian county from 1974 to 1996.

Authors:  Yu-Tong He; Jun Hou; Cui-Yun Qiao; Zhi-Feng Chen; Guo-Hui Song; Shao-Sen Li; Fan-Shu Meng; Hong-Xin Jin; Chao Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Esophagogastric anastomosis with invagination into stomach: New technique to reduce fistula formation.

Authors:  Alexandre Cruz Henriques; Carlos Alberto Godinho; Roberto Saad; Daniel Reis Waisberg; Aline Biral Zanon; Manlio Basilio Speranzini; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy, the LOGIC trial.

Authors:  Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Angela C Shore; Shahjehan A Wajed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Initial clinical outcomes after completion of training in a Canadian Royal College thoracic surgery program.

Authors:  Steven Milman; Thomas Ng
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Shinji Hattori; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Postoperative ventilation in the recovery area.

Authors:  M J Forshaw; A Z Khan; A R Davies; D C Strauss; A Pearce; R C Mason
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma in the middle thoracic esophagus after modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Zhou Wang; Xiang-Yan Liu; Fan-Ying Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Anastomotic dehiscence after esophagogastrectomy treated with stent and tissue matrix graft.

Authors:  Johan C Bakken; Ryan Law; Dennis Wigle; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

Authors:  Rajeev Parameswaran; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Rakesh Krishnadas; Martin Cooper; Richard Berrisford; Shahjehan Wajed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.