OBJECTIVES: We conducted a health impact assessment to quantify the potential impact of a state menu-labeling law on population weight gain in Los Angeles County, California. METHODS: We utilized published and unpublished data to model consumer response to point-of-purchase calorie postings at large chain restaurants in Los Angeles County. We conducted sensitivity analyses to account for uncertainty in consumer response and in the total annual revenue, market share, and average meal price of large chain restaurants in the county. RESULTS: Assuming that 10% of the restaurant patrons would order reduced-calorie meals in response to calorie postings, resulting in an average reduction of 100 calories per meal, we estimated that menu labeling would avert 40.6% of the 6.75 million pound average annual weight gain in the county population aged 5 years and older. Substantially larger impacts would be realized if higher percentages of patrons ordered reduced-calorie meals or if average per-meal calorie reductions increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that mandated menu labeling could have a sizable salutary impact on the obesity epidemic, even with only modest changes in consumer behavior.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a health impact assessment to quantify the potential impact of a state menu-labeling law on population weight gain in Los Angeles County, California. METHODS: We utilized published and unpublished data to model consumer response to point-of-purchase calorie postings at large chain restaurants in Los Angeles County. We conducted sensitivity analyses to account for uncertainty in consumer response and in the total annual revenue, market share, and average meal price of large chain restaurants in the county. RESULTS: Assuming that 10% of the restaurant patrons would order reduced-calorie meals in response to calorie postings, resulting in an average reduction of 100 calories per meal, we estimated that menu labeling would avert 40.6% of the 6.75 million pound average annual weight gain in the county population aged 5 years and older. Substantially larger impacts would be realized if higher percentages of patrons ordered reduced-calorie meals or if average per-meal calorie reductions increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that mandated menu labeling could have a sizable salutary impact on the obesity epidemic, even with only modest changes in consumer behavior.
Authors: Mary T Bassett; Tamara Dumanovsky; Christina Huang; Lynn D Silver; Candace Young; Cathy Nonas; Thomas D Matte; Sekai Chideya; Thomas R Frieden Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Elaine L Larson; Christina Araujo; Vanessa Sawyer; Olajide Williams Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Roxana Chen; Michael Smyser; Nadine Chan; Myduc Ta; Brian E Saelens; James Krieger Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christina A Roberto; Peter D Larsen; Henry Agnew; Jenny Baik; Kelly D Brownell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 9.308