Literature DB >> 1960753

Modeling interpatient pharmacodynamic variability of etoposide.

R Mick1, M J Ratain.   

Abstract

This report describes approaches to modeling interpatient pharmacodynamic variability of etoposide effect as measured by white blood cell count nadir. Such models may be utilized in adaptive control dosing to individualize the dose administered to a patient with the aim of lessening the risk of severe myelosuppression. We have successfully employed adaptive control dosing of etoposide administered by 72-hour continuous infusion based on our prior pharmacodynamic model for white blood cell count nadir. Data from our most recent series of 41 patients were used to investigate new linear and nonlinear pharmacodynamic models. We then cross-validated our best models on data from an independent series of 27 similarly treated patients. We identified an unbiased model that exhibited high precision in both data sets (root mean square errors of 1.11 x 10(3) and 1.20 x 10(3) cells/microL, respectively). The optimal model was a nonlinear Hill model defined by 24-hour etoposide concentration, pretreatment white blood cell count, and pretreatment serum albumin level. The level of albumin was found to be both a component of kinetic (protein binding) and dynamic (patient health) variability. Patients with lower pretreatment albumin levels are at higher risk of severe myelosuppression during etoposide therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1960753     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/83.21.1560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacodynamic analysis of hematologic profiles.

Authors:  G L Rosner; P Müller
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-12

Review 5.  Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Statistical approaches to pharmacodynamic modeling: motivations, methods, and misperceptions.

Authors:  R Mick; M J Ratain
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Influence of UGT1A1 polymorphism on etoposide plus platinum-induced neutropenia in Japanese patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Negoro; Ryoichi Yano; Mari Yoshimura; Yoko Suehiro; Shinji Yamashita; Takaaki Kodawara; Kyohei Watanabe; Hitoshi Tsukamoto; Toshiaki Nakamura; Maiko Kadowaki; Miwa Morikawa; Yukihiro Umeda; Masaki Anzai; Tamotsu Ishizuka; Nobuyuki Goto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Network pharmacodynamic models for customized cancer therapy.

Authors:  James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 9.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.