Literature DB >> 25914386

Network pharmacodynamic models for customized cancer therapy.

James M Gallo1, Marc R Birtwistle1.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) have always been integral to the design of rational drug dosing regimens. Early on PK-driven approaches came under the auspices of therapeutic drug monitoring that progressed into population-based PK and PK/PD modeling analyses. As the availability of tissue samples for measurement of drug concentrations is limited in patients, the bulk of such model-based methods relied on plasma drug concentrations to both build models and monitor therapy. The continued advances in systems biology and the spawning of systems pharmacology propelled the creation of enhanced PD (ePD) models. One of the main characteristic of ePD models is that they are derived from mechanistically grounded biochemical reaction networks. These models are commonly represented as systems of coupled ordinary differential equations with the ability to tailor each reaction and protein concentration to an individual's genomic/proteomic profile. As patient genomic analyses become more common, many genetic and protein abnormalities can be represented in the ePD models, and thus offer a path toward personalized anticancer therapies. By linking PK models to ePD models, a full spectrum of pharmacological simulation tools is available to design sophisticated multidrug regimens. However, ePD models are not a panacea and face challenges in model identifiability, scaling and parameter estimation. Nonetheless, as new technologies evolve and are coupled with fresh ideas on model implementation, it is likely that ePD and PK/ePD models will be considered a viable enterprise to customize anticancer drug therapy.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914386      PMCID: PMC4457588          DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med        ISSN: 1939-005X


  31 in total

Review 1.  The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development.

Authors:  Janet Woodcock; Raymond Woosley
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 2.  Merging systems biology with pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Ravi Iyengar; Shan Zhao; Seung-Wook Chung; Donald E Mager; James M Gallo
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Assessment of aminoglycoside dosing and estimated glomerular filtration rate in determining gentamicin and tobramycin area under the curve and clearance.

Authors:  A K H Lim; G Mathanasenarajah; I Larmour
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.048

4.  Population pharmacokinetic model for topotecan derived from phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Gallo; P B Laub; E K Rowinsky; L B Grochow; S D Baker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Dose and outcome: the hurdle of neutropenia (Review).

Authors:  Maurizio Marangolo; Carmelo Bengala; Pier Franco Conte; Marco Danova; Paolo Pronzato; Giovanni Rosti; Paola Sagrada
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Sequential application of anticancer drugs enhances cell death by rewiring apoptotic signaling networks.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Albert S Ye; Alexandra K Gardino; Anne Margriet Heijink; Peter K Sorger; Gavin MacBeath; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ingolia; Sina Ghaemmaghami; John R S Newman; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models.

Authors:  Ryan N Gutenkunst; Joshua J Waterfall; Fergal P Casey; Kevin S Brown; Christopher R Myers; James P Sethna
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A General Network Pharmacodynamic Model-Based Design Pipeline for Customized Cancer Therapy Applied to the VEGFR Pathway.

Authors:  X-Y Zhang; M R Birtwistle; J M Gallo
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-15
View more
  6 in total

1.  Integrating Transcriptomic Data with Mechanistic Systems Pharmacology Models for Virtual Drug Combination Trials.

Authors:  Anne Marie Barrette; Mehdi Bouhaddou; Marc R Birtwistle
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 2.  Molecular mechanism matters: Benefits of mechanistic computational models for drug development.

Authors:  Lindsay E Clegg; Feilim Mac Gabhann
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 3.  Computational oncology--mathematical modelling of drug regimens for precision medicine.

Authors:  Dominique Barbolosi; Joseph Ciccolini; Bruno Lacarelle; Fabrice Barlési; Nicolas André
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Looking beyond the cancer cell for effective drug combinations.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dry; Mi Yang; Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Emerging roles for clinical pharmacometrics in cancer precision medicine.

Authors:  Sujit Nair; Ah-Ng Tony Kong
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2018-04-20

6.  Analysis of copy number loss of the ErbB4 receptor tyrosine kinase in glioblastoma.

Authors:  DeAnalisa C Jones; Adriana Scanteianu; Matthew DiStefano; Mehdi Bouhaddou; Marc R Birtwistle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.