Literature DB >> 23328908

Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Roberta Ferrucci1, Andre R Brunoni, Marta Parazzini, Maurizio Vergari, Elena Rossi, Manuela Fumagalli, Francesca Mameli, Manuela Rosa, Gaia Giannicola, Stefano Zago, Alberto Priori.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies suggest that the cerebellum contributes to human cognitive processing, particularly procedural learning. This type of learning is often described as implicit learning and involves automatic, associative, and unintentional learning processes. Our aim was to investigate whether cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) influences procedural learning as measured by the serial reaction time task (SRTT), in which subjects make speeded key press responses to visual cues. A preliminary modeling study demonstrated that our electrode montage (active electrode over the cerebellum with an extra-cephalic reference) generated the maximum electric field amplitude in the cerebellum. We enrolled 21 healthy subjects (aged 20-49 years). Participants did the SRTT, a visual analogue scale and a visual attention task, before and 35 min after receiving 20-min anodal and sham cerebellar tDCS in a randomized order. To avoid carry-over effects, experimental sessions were held at least 1 week apart. For our primary outcome measure (difference in RTs for random and repeated blocks) anodal versus sham tDCS, RTs were significantly slower for sham tDCS than for anodal cerebellar tDCS (p = 0.04), demonstrating that anodal tDCS influenced implicit learning processes. When we assessed RTs for procedural learning across the one to eight blocks, we found that RTs changed significantly after anodal stimulation (interaction "time" × "blocks 1/8": anodal, p = 0.006), but after sham tDCS, they remained unchanged (p = 0.094). No significant changes were found in the other variables assessed. Our finding that anodal cerebellar tDCS improves an implicit learning type essential to the development of several motor skills or cognitive activity suggests that the cerebellum has a critical role in procedural learning. tDCS could be a new tool for improving procedural learning in daily life in healthy subjects and for correcting abnormal learning in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328908     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-012-0436-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  50 in total

1.  Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Allen W Song; Avi Karni; Francois Lalonde; Michelle M Adams; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Procedural learning and dyslexia.

Authors:  R I Nicolson; A J Fawcett; R L Brookes; J Needle
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2010-08

Review 4.  New light through old windows: moving beyond the "virtual lesion" approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory.

Authors:  R Ferrucci; S Marceglia; M Vergari; F Cogiamanian; S Mrakic-Sposta; F Mameli; S Zago; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The cerebellum, cerebellar disorders, and cerebellar research--two centuries of discoveries.

Authors:  Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning.

Authors:  R D Seidler; A Purushotham; S-G Kim; K Uğurbil; D Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Foundations for a new science of learning.

Authors:  Andrew N Meltzoff; Patricia K Kuhl; Javier Movellan; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  59 in total

1.  Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Shirin Mahdavi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad-Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Hamed Ekhtiari; Mohammad Darainy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Procedural Learning in Nonclinical Psychosis: A Double-Blind Crossover Study.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; Derek J Dean; Nicholas J Kelley; Jessica A Bernard; Ivanka Ristanovic; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) Impairs Balance Control in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Águida Foerster; Lorena Melo; Marina Mello; Rebeca Castro; Lívia Shirahige; Sérgio Rocha; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on learning fine-motor sequences.

Authors:  Renee E Shimizu; Allan D Wu; Jasmine K Samra; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning.

Authors:  Alit Stark-Inbar; Meher Raza; Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Influence of intranasal exposure of MPTP in multiple doses on liver functions and transition from non-motor to motor symptoms in a rat PD model.

Authors:  Indrani Datta; S R Mekha; Alka Kaushal; Kavina Ganapathy; Rema Razdan
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  A hypothetical universal model of cerebellar function: reconsideration of the current dogma.

Authors:  Ari Magal
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.