Literature DB >> 19603887

Testing the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis with hearing-impaired listeners.

Jeremy Marozeau1, Mary Florentine.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of the present experiment was to test whether the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis (i.e., the loudness ratio between monaural and binaural tones presented at the same Sound Pressure Level, SPL, is independent of SPL) holds for hearing-impaired listeners with bilaterally symmetrical hearing losses. The outcome of this experiment provided a theoretical construct for modeling loudness-growth functions. A cross-modality matching task between string length and tones was used to measure three loudness functions for eight listeners: two monaural (left and right) and one binaural. A multiple linear regression was performed to test the significance of presentation mode (monaural vs binaural and left vs right), level, and their interaction. Results indicate that monaural loudness functions differ between the ears of two listeners. The interaction between presentation mode (binaural/monaural) and level was significant for one listener. Although significant, these differences were quite small. Generally, the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis appears to hold for hearing-impaired listeners. These data also indicate that loudness-growth functions in two ears of an individual are more similar than loudness-growth functions in ears from different listeners. Finally, it is demonstrated that loudness-growth functions can be constructed for individual listeners from binaural level difference for equal-loudness data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603887      PMCID: PMC2723906          DOI: 10.1121/1.3133703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Quantification of audiogram fine-structure as a function of hearing threshold.

Authors:  J Wiebe Horst; Hero P Wit; Frans W J Albers
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions.

Authors:  Michael Epstein; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Loudness of brief tones measured by magnitude estimation and loudness matching.

Authors:  Michael Epstein; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Observations upon the loudness recruitment phenomenon, with special reference to the differential diagnosis of disorders of the internal ear and eighth nerve.

Authors:  M R DIX; C S HALLPIKE; J D HOOD
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1948-08

5.  Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling.

Authors:  T Brand; V Hohmann
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

6.  Binaural summation of the loudness of pure tones.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Binaural summation of loudness: noise and two-tone complexes.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

8.  Magnitude estimation of loudness. II: Loudness perception in presbycusic listeners.

Authors:  K K Knight; R H Margolis
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

9.  Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relation between the growth of loudness and high-frequency excitation.

Authors:  R P Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural loudness summation for speech presented via earphones and loudspeaker with and without visual cues.

Authors:  Michael Epstein; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.