Literature DB >> 16642806

Loudness of brief tones measured by magnitude estimation and loudness matching.

Michael Epstein1, Mary Florentine.   

Abstract

McFadden [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 702-704 (1975)] questioned the accuracy and reliability of magnitude estimation for measuring loudness of tones that vary both in duration and level, whereas Stevens and Hall [Percept. Psychophys. 1, 319-327 (1966)] reported reasonable group data. To gain insight into this discrepancy, the present study compares loudness measures for 5- and 200-ms tones using magnitude estimation and equal-loudness matches from the same listeners. Results indicate that both procedures provide rapid and accurate assessments of group loudness functions for brief tones, but may not be reliable enough to reveal specific characteristics of loudness in individual listeners.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16642806     DOI: 10.1121/1.2177592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Testing the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis with hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between Respiratory Load Perception and Perception of Nonrespiratory Sensory Modalities in Subjects with Life-Threatening Asthma.

Authors:  Kathleen L Davenport; Chien Hui Huang; Matthew P Davenport; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2012-06-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.