Literature DB >> 15237835

Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears.

Brian C J Moore1.   

Abstract

Buus and Florentine [J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 120-139 (2002)] have proposed that loudness recruitment in cases of cochlear hearing loss is caused partly by an abnormally large loudness at absolute threshold. This has been called "softness imperception." To evaluate this idea, loudness-matching functions were obtained using tones at very low sensation levels. For subjects with asymmetrical hearing loss, matches were obtained for a single frequency across ears. For subjects with sloping hearing loss, matches were obtained between tones at two frequencies, one where the absolute threshold was nearly normal and one where there was a moderate hearing loss. Loudness matching was possible for sensation levels (SLs) as low as 2 dB. When the fixed tone was presented at a very low SL in an ear (or at a frequency) where there was hearing impairment, it was matched by a tone with approximately the same SL in an ear (or at a frequency) where hearing was normal (e.g., 2 dB SL matched 2 dB SL). This relationship held for SLs up to 4-10 dB, depending on the subject. These results are not consistent with the concept of softness imperception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15237835     DOI: 10.1121/1.1738839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

3.  Threshold and beyond: modeling the intensity dependence of auditory responses.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-14

Review 4.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

5.  Testing the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis with hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

7.  Neural signatures of auditory hypersensitivity following acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Matthew McGill; Ariel E Hight; Yurika L Watanabe; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Dongqin Cai; Kameron Clayton; Kenneth E Hancock; Anne Takesian; Sharon G Kujawa; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Wei-Li D Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

9.  Loudness perception in the domestic cat: reaction time estimates of equal loudness contours and recruitment effects.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Nicole Little; Stephanie Saylor
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-07

Review 10.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.