Literature DB >> 19597739

Interaction of ion tracks in spatial and temporal proximity.

Maximilian Stephan Kreipl1, Werner Friedland, Herwig G Paretzke.   

Abstract

In the present work, a systematic analysis of the impact of spatial and temporal proximity of ion tracks on the yield of higher-order radiolytic species as well as of DNA damage patterns is presented. This potential impact may be of concern when laser-driven particle accelerators are used for ion radiation therapy. The biophysical Monte Carlo track structure code PARTRAC was used and, to this end, extended in two aspects: first, the temporal information about track evolution has been included in the track structure module and, second, the simulation code has been modified to enable parallel multiple track processing during simulation of subsequent modelling stages. Depending on the spatial and temporal separation between ion-track pairs, the yield of chemical species has been calculated for incident protons with start energies of 20 MeV, for He(2+) ions with start energies of 1 and 20 MeV, and for 60 MeV C(6+) ions. Provided the overlap of the considered ion tracks is sufficient in all four dimensions (space and time), the yield of hydroxyl radicals was found to be reduced compared to that of single tracks, for all considered ion types. The biological endpoints investigated were base damages, single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, and clustered lesions for incident pairs of protons and He(2+) ions, each with start energies of 20 MeV. The yield of clustered lesions produced by 20 MeV protons turned out to be influenced by the spatial separation of the proton pair; in contrast, no influence was found for different start times of the protons. The yield of single-strand breaks and base hits was found neither to depend on the spatial separation nor on the temporal separation between the incident protons. For incident 20 MeV He(2+) ions, however, a dependence on the spatial and temporal separation of the ion pair was found for all considered biological endpoints. Nevertheless, spatial proximity conditions where such intertrack effects were obtained are not met in the case of tumour radiation therapy; thus, no impact on radiation effects due to short pulse duration of laser-driven accelerators can be expected from alterations during the chemical stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19597739     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-009-0234-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  14 in total

1.  Stochastic aspects and uncertainties in the prechemical and chemical stages of electron tracks in liquid water: a quantitative analysis based on Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  F Ballarini; M Biaggi; M Merzagora; A Ottolenghi; M Dingfelder; W Friedland; P Jacob; H G Paretzke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Simulation of DNA damage after proton irradiation.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Peter Jacob; Philipp Bernhardt; Herwig G Paretzke; Michael Dingfelder
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code.

Authors:  G Kreth; J Finsterle; J von Hase; M Cremer; C Cremer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Simulation of light ion induced DNA damage patterns.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Peter Jacob; Herwig G Paretzke; Andrea Ottolenghi; Francesca Ballarini; Marco Liotta
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 5.  First steps towards systems radiation biology studies concerned with DNA and chromosome structure within living cells.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Herwig G Paretzke; Francesca Ballarini; Andrea Ottolenghi; Gregor Kreth; Christoph Cremer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Time- and space-resolved Monte Carlo study of water radiolysis for photon, electron and ion irradiation.

Authors:  Maximilian S Kreipl; Werner Friedland; Herwig G Paretzke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Comparisons of calculations with PARTRAC and NOREC: transport of electrons in liquid water.

Authors:  M Dingfelder; R H Ritchie; J E Turner; W Friedland; H G Paretzke; R N Hamm
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Monte Carlo simulation of diffusion and reaction in water radiolysis--a study of reactant 'jump through' and jump distances.

Authors:  R N Hamm; J E Turner; M G Stabin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Modelling study on the protective role of OH radical scavengers and DNA higher-order structures in induction of single- and double-strand break by gamma-radiation.

Authors:  A Valota; F Ballarini; W Friedland; P Jacob; A Ottolenghi; H G Paretzke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Stochastic properties of radiation-induced DSB: DSB distributions in large scale chromatin loops, the HPRT gene and within the visible volumes of DNA repair foci.

Authors:  Artem L Ponomarev; Sylvain V Costes; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  A new calculation on spectrum of direct DNA damage induced by low-energy electrons.

Authors:  Liming Zhang; Zhenyu Tan
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Energy deposition and relative frequency of hits of cylindrical nanovolume in medium irradiated by ions: Monte Carlo simulation of tracks structure.

Authors:  Ianik Plante; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Faster and safer? FLASH ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Mark Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Survival of tumor cells after proton irradiation with ultra-high dose rates.

Authors:  Susanne Auer; Volker Hable; Christoph Greubel; Guido A Drexler; Thomas E Schmid; Claus Belka; Günther Dollinger; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Simulation of early DNA damage after the irradiation of a fibroblast cell nucleus using Geant4-DNA.

Authors:  Sylvain Meylan; Sébastien Incerti; Mathieu Karamitros; Nicolas Tang; Marta Bueno; Isabelle Clairand; Carmen Villagrasa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comprehensive track-structure based evaluation of DNA damage by light ions from radiotherapy-relevant energies down to stopping.

Authors:  W Friedland; E Schmitt; P Kundrát; M Dingfelder; G Baiocco; S Barbieri; A Ottolenghi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Study of the Influence of NanOx Parameters.

Authors:  Caterina Monini; Micaela Cunha; Etienne Testa; Michaёl Beuve
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  LET-Dependent Intertrack Yields in Proton Irradiation at Ultra-High Dose Rates Relevant for FLASH Therapy.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; N Domínguez-Kondo; J Schuemann; A McNamara; E Moreno-Barbosa; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Antiproton induced DNA damage: proton like in flight, carbon-ion like near rest.

Authors:  J N Kavanagh; F J Currell; D J Timson; K I Savage; D J Richard; S J McMahon; O Hartley; G A P Cirrone; F Romano; K M Prise; N Bassler; M H Holzscheiter; G Schettino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.