Literature DB >> 19590861

Dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles during vertebral movement in the cat.

Dong-Yuan Cao1, Partap S Khalsa, Joel G Pickar.   

Abstract

Muscle spindles provide essential information for appropriate motor control. In appendicular muscles, much is known about their position and movement sensitivities, but little is known about the axial muscles of the low back. We investigated the dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindle afferents from L(6) dorsal root filaments during constant velocity movement of the L(6) vertebra (the feline has seven lumbar vertebrae) in Nembutal-anesthetized cats. Actuations of 1 mm applied at the L(6) spinous process were delivered at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mm/s. The slow velocity component was measured as the slope of the relationship between displacement during the constant velocity ramp and instantaneous discharge frequency. The quick velocity component was the slope's intercept at zero displacement. The peak component was determined as the highest discharge rates occurring near the end of the ramp compared with control. The slow velocity component over the three increasing velocities was 23.9 (9.9), 21.6 (9.6) and 20.5 (9.5) imp/(s mm) [mean (SD)], respectively. The quick velocity component was 28.4 (8.6), 31.4 (9.8) and 35.8 (10.6) imp/s, respectively. These measures of dynamic responsiveness were at least 5-10 times higher compared with values reported for appendicular muscle spindles. The peak component's velocity sensitivity was 2.9 (imp/s)/(mm/s) [0.2, 5.5, lower, upper 95% confidence interval] similar to that for cervical paraspinal muscles as well as appendicular muscles. Increased dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles may insure central driving to insure control of intervertebral motion during changes in spinal orientation. It may also contribute to large, rapid and potentially injurious increases in paraspinal muscle activity during sudden and unexpected muscle stretch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590861     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1924-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Classification and response characteristics of muscle spindle afferents in the primate.

Authors:  P D Cheney; J B Preston
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Synaptic inputs from low threshold afferents of trunk muscles to motoneurons innervating the longissimus lumborum muscle in the spinal cat.

Authors:  Naomi Wada; Kuniaki Takahashi; Kenro Kanda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  THE RESPONSE OF DE-EFFERENTED MUSCLE SPINDLE RECEPTORS TO STRETCHING AT DIFFERENT VELOCITIES.

Authors:  P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Synaptic input from homonymous group I afferents in m. longissimus lumborum motoneurons in the L4 spinal segment in cats.

Authors:  Junko Akatani; Kenro Kanda; Naomi Wada
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.

Authors:  A Bergmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

7.  Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Spinal projection of spindle afferents of the longissimus lumborum muscles of the cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The development of response strategies in preparation for sudden loading to the torso.

Authors:  S A Lavender; W S Marras; R A Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lengthening but not shortening history of paraspinal muscle spindles in the low back alters their dynamic sensitivity.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The decreased responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to a prior history of spinal muscle lengthening is graded with the magnitude of change in vertebral position.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Using vertebral movement and intact paraspinal muscles to determine the distribution of intrafusal fiber innervation of muscle spindle afferents in the anesthetized cat.

Authors:  William R Reed; Dong-Yuan Cao; Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of changing lumbar stiffness by single facet joint dysfunction on the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to vertebral movement.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

7.  Neural Responses to Physical Characteristics of a High-velocity, Low-amplitude Spinal Manipulation: Effect of Thrust Direction.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Randall S Sozio; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.