Literature DB >> 19590620

The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience.

Fabian Mc Johnston1, Antonino Cavataio, Steven M Strasberg, Nicholas A Hamilton, Peter O Simon, Kathryn Trinkaus, M B Majella Doyle, Brent D Mathews, Matthew R Porembka, David C Linehan, William G Hawkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic occlusion failure (POF) after distal pancreatectomy remains a common source of morbidity. Here, we review our experience with distal pancreatectomy and attempt to identify factors which influence POF rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine distal pancreatectomies were performed between 2002 and 2007. Review of the computerized medical records and physician office records was performed for all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors which might influence the incidence of POF. The data set was analysed for factors which might influence the pancreatic occlusion rate. Analysis included patient and disease characteristics including: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, consistency of the pancreas and history of pancreatitis, as well as intra-operative variables including: surgeon, absorbable mesh reinforcement and operative approach.
RESULTS: POF was the most common peri-operative complication. POF was identified in 32 out of 169 patients (19%). Transection technique (hand sewn, stapled, stapled with mesh) and procedure complexity were factors associated with differences in POF rates by both univariate and multivariate analyses. POF was identified in 7 out of 70 patients (10%) when an absorbable mesh was utilized, and 25 of 99 patients (25%) when mesh was not utilized (P < 0.02). DISCUSSION: These data suggest that a randomized controlled trial will be required to determine if mesh reinforcement reduces the rate and severity of POF after distal pancreatectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distal pancreatectomy; mesh reinforcement; pancreatic fistula; pancreatic leak

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590620      PMCID: PMC2697864          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  40 in total

1.  Air leaks after surgical stapling in lung resection: a comparison between stapling alone and stapling with staple-line reinforcement materials in a canine model.

Authors:  L D Roberson; D E Netherland; R Dhillon; B J Heath
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Closure of wounds of the stomach and pancreas with tissue adhesive and autoplastic peritoneum patch: an experimental study.

Authors:  G Gyurkó; R Czehelnik
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yin-Mo Yang; Xiao-Dong Tian; Yan Zhuang; Wei-Min Wang; Yuan-Lian Wan; Yan-Ting Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

Review 5.  Standard surgical treatment in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Wagner; N Dikopoulos; C Kulli; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jeffrey S Barkun
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Min P Kim; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; Joann A Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Results of a technique of pancreaticojejunostomy that optimizes blood supply to the pancreas.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M S McNevin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mesh reinforcement of pancreatic transection decreases incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure for left pancreatectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hamilton; Matthew R Porembka; Fabian M Johnston; Feng Gao; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Does Pancreatic Stump Closure Method Influence Distal Pancreatectomy Outcomes?

Authors:  Eugene P Ceppa; Robert M McCurdy; David C Becerra; E Molly Kilbane; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Keith D Lillemoe; Henry A Pitt; Michael G House
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Body mass index and outcomes from pancreatic resection: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Ramsey; Robert C Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Impact of distal pancreatectomy on outcomes of peritoneal surface disease treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea N Doud; Reese W Randle; Clancy J Clark; Edward A Levine; Katrina R Swett; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Attempts to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Yasuhisa Mori; Kohei Nakata; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Bulent Salman; Tonguc Utku Yilmaz; Kursat Dikmen; Mehmet Kaplan
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-12

7.  Reinforced staplers for distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Ken-Ichi Okada; Sohei Satoi; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Masanori Kon; Yoshiaki Murakami; Naru Kondo; Masayuki Sho; Takahiro Akahori; Hirochika Toyama; Takumi Fukumoto; Tsutomu Fujii; Ippei Matsumoto; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Hisashi Ikoma; Yutaka Takeda; Jiro Fujimoto; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Arguments for an individualized closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Frank Makowiec; Olivia Sick; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-27

9.  Cost benefit analysis of mesh reinforcement of stapled left pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Kamran Idrees; Joshua R Edler; David C Linehan; Steven M Strasberg; David Jacques; Nicholas A Hamilton; Ryan C Fields; Dennis Lambert; Steven Kymes; William G Hawkins
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Meta-analysis of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement and risk of fistula following pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Eric H Jensen; Pamela R Portschy; Jessica Chowaniec; Ming Teng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.