Literature DB >> 23458681

Cost benefit analysis of mesh reinforcement of stapled left pancreatectomy.

Kamran Idrees1, Joshua R Edler2, David C Linehan1,3, Steven M Strasberg1,3, David Jacques1, Nicholas A Hamilton1, Ryan C Fields1,3, Dennis Lambert2, Steven Kymes2, William G Hawkins1,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic leak is a morbid complication following left pancreatectomy, which results in prolonged hospitalization, additional diagnostic testing and invasive procedures. The present authors have previously demonstrated that mesh reinforcement of stapled left pancreatectomy results in fewer pancreatic leaks. This study was conducted to investigate whether mesh reinforcement also results in cost benefits for the health care system.
METHODS: A cost benefit model was developed to estimate net cost savings from the payer's perspective. The model is based on the results of a randomized, single-blinded trial of mesh versus no mesh reinforcement of the pancreatic remnant after left pancreatectomy. A two-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the model's sensitivity to fluctuations in the cost of mesh and the effectiveness of the mesh in reducing clinically significant leaks.
RESULTS: Average total costs for an episode of care were US$13 337 and US$15 505 for patients who did and did not receive mesh, respectively, which indicates savings of US$2168. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that, given a probability of 1.9% for developing a clinically significant leak in patients in whom mesh reinforcement was used, the strategy would continue to save costs if mesh were priced at ≤US$1804.
CONCLUSIONS: Mesh reinforcement decreases clinically significant pancreatic leaks. Despite the additional cost of mesh reinforcement, the use of mesh reinforcement results in overall cost savings for the health care system because of the resultant decrease in the occurrence of clinically significant leaks.
© 2013 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23458681      PMCID: PMC4503287          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  16 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  H P Knaebel; M K Diener; M N Wente; M W Büchler; C M Seiler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Economic evaluation of treatment strategies in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Michael F Drummond
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Economic evaluation in the US: what is the missing link?

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Mesh reinforcement of pancreatic transection decreases incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure for left pancreatectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hamilton; Matthew R Porembka; Fabian M Johnston; Feng Gao; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  An introduction to decision analysis in the economic evaluation of the prevention and treatment of vision-related diseases.

Authors:  Steven M Kymes
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.648

6.  Standardizing cost-effectiveness analyses: the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.

Authors:  M R Gold
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.

Authors:  M Gold
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience.

Authors:  Fabian Mc Johnston; Antonino Cavataio; Steven M Strasberg; Nicholas A Hamilton; Peter O Simon; Kathryn Trinkaus; M B Majella Doyle; Brent D Mathews; Matthew R Porembka; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.