Literature DB >> 1958623

Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys).

M K Tsilimbaris1, I G Vlachonikolis, D Siganos, G Makridakis, I G Pallikaris.   

Abstract

We examined 92 normal eyes using Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys) intending to compare the keratometric readings obtained by these two instruments. Dioptric power and location at flatter and steeper meridians, keratometric astigmatism values, and average central keratometric power were measured in the central cornea of all eyes. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in flatter meridians' mean power values (mean difference = 0.13 D, P = .008), mean keratometric astigmatism values (mean difference = -0.20 D, P = .001) and steeper meridians' location (mean difference = 7 degrees, P = .0001). There was no significant difference in steeper meridians' mean power values (mean difference = -0.06 D, P = .38), flatter meridian location (mean difference = 5.9 degrees, P = .07), and mean average central keratometric power (mean difference = 0.03 D, P = .471). Clinically meaningful difference was observed only in keratometric astigmatism readings of eyes with keratometric astigmatism higher than 1.50 D (mean difference = -0.84 D). For all the other parameters measured, the differences between the two instruments readings were clinically acceptable.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1958623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg        ISSN: 1042-962X


  3 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of keratometry and computerised videokeratography: intraobserver and interobserver variability on normal and astigmatic corneas.

Authors:  C H Karabatsas; S D Cook; J Papaefthymiou; P Turner; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Authors:  Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Sara Bigdeli; Ashkan Shahnazi; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices.

Authors:  Qinmei Wang; Giacomo Savini; Kenneth J Hoffer; Zhen Xu; Yifan Feng; Daizong Wen; Yanjun Hua; Feng Yang; Chao Pan; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.