Literature DB >> 19583473

Responding with restraint: what are the neurocognitive mechanisms?

Sara Jahfari1, Cathy M Stinear, Mike Claffey, Frederick Verbruggen, Adam R Aron.   

Abstract

An important aspect of cognitive control is the ability to respond with restraint. Here, we modeled this experimentally by measuring the degree of response slowing that occurs when people respond to an imperative stimulus in a context where they might suddenly need to stop the initiated response compared with a context in which they do not need to stop. We refer to the RT slowing that occurs as the "response delay effect." We conjectured that this response delay effect could relate to one or more neurocognitive mechanism(s): partial response suppression (i.e., "active braking"), prolonged decision time, and slower response facilitation. These accounts make different predictions about motor system excitability and brain activation. To test which neurocognitive mechanisms underlie the response delay effect, we performed two studies with TMS and we reanalyzed fMRI data. The results suggest that the response delay effect is at least partly explained by active braking, possibly involving a mechanism that is similar to that used to stop responses completely. These results further our understanding of how people respond with restraint by pointing to proactive recruitment of a neurocognitive mechanism heretofore associated with outright stopping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19583473      PMCID: PMC2952035          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  29 in total

1.  Effects of focal transcranial magnetic stimulation on simple reaction time to acoustic, visual and somatosensory stimuli.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; J Valls-Solé; E M Wassermann; J Brasil-Neto; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Gerhard Rinkenauer; Allen Osman; Rolf Ulrich; Hiltraut Muller-Gethmann; Stefan Mattes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-06

Review 3.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  P M Rossini; A T Barker; A Berardelli; M D Caramia; G Caruso; R Q Cracco; M R Dimitrijević; M Hallett; Y Katayama; C H Lücking
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08

6.  Delay in simple reaction time after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain occurs at the final motor output stage.

Authors:  U Ziemann; F Tergau; J Netz; V Hömberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Preparatory inhibition of cortico-spinal excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man.

Authors:  T Hasbroucq; H Kaneko; M Akamatsu; C A Possamaï
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1997-03

8.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.

Authors:  R De Jong; M G Coles; G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs.

Authors:  J W Mink
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Trisha Van Zandt; Frederick Verbruggen; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  92 in total

1.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Expectations and violations: delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control.

Authors:  Bram B Zandbelt; Mirjam Bloemendaal; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; René S Kahn; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Striatal dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Buyean Lee; Chelsea L Robertson; Golnaz Tabibnia; Andrew T Morgan; Natalie De Shetler; Amira K Brown; John R Monterosso; Adam R Aron; Mark A Mandelkern; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Vocal response inhibition is enhanced by anodal tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  A fronto-striato-subthalamic-pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition.

Authors:  Marjan Jahanshahi; Ignacio Obeso; John C Rothwell; José A Obeso
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Right prefrontal and ventral striatum interactions underlying impulsive choice and impulsive responding.

Authors:  Brendan Behan; Adam Stone; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Chronometric electrical stimulation of right inferior frontal cortex increases motor braking.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Christopher R Conner; Adam R Aron; Nitin Tandon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations.

Authors:  Michael P Claffey; Sarah Sheldon; Cathy M Stinear; Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.